Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th September 2010, 03:32 AM   #1
cuibono is offline cuibono  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cuibono's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
Default Audibility of Non-Linear Distortion: A Practicum

I'm a real measurements person, but I like to keep things practical. After looking at enough graphs of harmonic distortion for different drivers, I decided to try a simple experiment - can I actually hear a 5th harmonic at -xxdB down from the fundamental?

I devised a relatively simple method of doing this. Using a digital audio 'workstation' (Cocko's Reaper), I set up a series of pitch shifters, one each producing a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th harmonic. I patched in a stereo input (from my CD player), and also sent out the unprocessed 'fundamental'. I then patched everything out on one channel to my amplifier. I checked that the results with a FFT and a microphone, to make sure I was on target for my harmonics.

I also created an 'IMD' test, but taking two pitch shifters, and setting their output to +15% and -15% of the fundamental frequency. For a single tone, this produces a warble tone, often used in speaker testing. Watching a FFT of the output of a speaker, it was obvious this induces a lot of IMD.

Here is a screenshot of my setup:
Click the image to open in full size.

So using the volume control on the various harmonics/IMD tracks, and the 'solo' buttons, I could listen to specific levels of each harmonic/IMD. The volume slider lets you set a specific -dB relative to the fundamental/source signal.

The results were surprising. Here is a chart of the point where I could no longer hear a difference between just the original, and the original plus the harmonic/IMD:
Click the image to open in full size.

All listening was done on a single Pluto loudspeaker, my head 18" from the speaker, at a 90dB SPL level.

The warble tone was of a 100Hz sine wave. All other tests were done with music. I can provide reference to the specific albums if people really want.

A few things were surprising - the biggest was that with music, for the most part, I couldn't hear differences below -40dB down. Particularly with the IMD test, which was particularly noxious at high levels, below -30dB, it was basically inaudible.

I noticed that music with lot of HF content made it easier to hear (Vivaldi). Music with lots of bass, and/or lots of compression made is harder to hear differences (Nujabes). Contrary to 'common knowledge', complex music (orchestral) masked differences while simple (singer/acoustic guitar) made it easier to hear differences. So the point at which difference could be heard changed depending on the music, but still within what I would call a small window- ie, somewhere between -30 and -40dB.

I've zipped up the file I made to do these sort of examinations, so other people can try it. Reaper can be downloaded for free, and then use the file I've attached. People will have to route their hardware I/O (on each track), but other than that, it should be relatively straightforward. Use the solo button of the harmonics/imd to turn them on or off. Keep the 'fundamental' solo on. Change the level of the harmonics/imd with the track's respective volume sliders. Don't change the level of the track labeled 'fundamental'. To change the volume of the IMD tracks, use the volume slider and solo button of 'IMD1' - 'IMD2' is slaved to it. Be careful where you click, you may disrupt some of the internal routing.

Feedback? I, for one, am less worried about non-linear distortion now.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Harmonic Generator.zip (24.5 KB, 2 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 04:09 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Very interesting, cuibono! Thank you for sharing your work!

Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 04:13 AM   #3
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Very cool, thanks for this. I've searched a lot for a software that would do this very thing, but had not found one that was practical or easy to use.

One question for you: Did you measure the harmonic levels at the Pluto itself? Or did you just chart the digital signal harmonic levels?
Reason I ask is that lower order harmonics can mask the higher orders to some extent. Much of that was mapped out in research in the 1930's 70's and 80's. So it would be nice to know what was actually coming out of the speaker itself.

The levels you've found tend to agree with what is generally considered a "good" roll-off of harmonic.

EDIT: Oh, I see. You did measure at the speaker itself, good!
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test!
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 06:56 PM   #4
cuibono is offline cuibono  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cuibono's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
You know, this thread probably belongs in a different subforum - general interest? Could a mod move it? Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 07:18 PM   #5
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Moved from Multi-Way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 11:27 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
I am not certain but I think you are confusing IMD with non-linear distortion. There may be a relationship, but non-linear distortion typically will vary with amplitude.

Also much discussion has revolved around the 7th and 9th harmonics...

Then too one needs to know the baseline IMD of the speaker itself, minus the added (synthesized) distortion signal...

Complex orchestral recordings can't be lumped into a single category. There are some very well recorded ones, and some that are not. On a very low distortion system I have found that the better the recording, the better the listening experience and also the detail, whereas on systems that have "difficulty" with complex passages one gets the result that you reported.

Just opinions. Mine.

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Audibility of nonlinear distortion Pan Multi-Way 37 4th December 2008 07:41 PM
Audibility of Distortion Listening Test...FUN! MJL21193 Everything Else 57 20th February 2008 09:13 PM
Non Linear Distortion testing - Harmonic Distortion JMB Multi-Way 0 20th July 2004 02:54 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Page generated in 0.10259 seconds (77.25% PHP - 22.75% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio