Bybee Quantum Purifier Measurement and Analysis - Page 21

cbdb · 1st September 2010, 06:09 PM

I find it interesting that one of the biggest and most vocal supporters of Bybee, J Curl hasnt posted a single reply or comment. I guess if he helped design the test he wont be able to poo poo it later.

Rodeodave · 1st September 2010, 06:57 PM

We should x-ray them.
Do we know someone with the appropriate equipment and experience?

Pano · 1st September 2010, 07:00 PM

Yes we do. He has been x-raying vacuum tubes and posting here.
Kenpeter is the guy.

john curl · 1st September 2010, 07:14 PM

cbdb, I have been offline for several days, due to a computer crash. However, what is going on here is pointless, and redundant, except for exeric, who actually tried them. I have had similar experiences as he has.
As far as the resistor is concerned, OF COURSE THERE IS A RESISTOR. There has always been a resistor that parallels the device. Whether on the inside or around the outside, there has ALWAYS been a resistor added. The early resistors measured .25-.3 ohms and the latest resistors measure about .025 ohm. They always did and they always will. However that is NOT the Bybee device. It measures several ohms, but its resistance is lost in the paralleling with the low R resistor.
Now when you go beyond measuring the resistor, please let me know.

Rodeodave · 1st September 2010, 07:16 PM

Found it: Grid - Screen Alignment (X-Rays)

SY · 1st September 2010, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john curl

what is going on here is pointless, and redundant,

Excellent, it's already been done! Where can I find the detailed measurements?

jneutron · 1st September 2010, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SY

Excellent, it's already been done! Where can I find the detailed measurements?

You meant detailed measurements AND detailed measurement setup sufficient to repeat the measurements...

Cheers, John

Pano · 1st September 2010, 07:24 PM

Or controlled listening tests.

SY · 1st September 2010, 07:26 PM

jneutron: Yes, that's a crucial part of the detail. I would be absolutely embarrassed to put up data without information suitable for replicability.

Cassiel · 1st September 2010, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SY

Where can I find the detailed measurements?

Quote:

The early resistors measured .25-.3 ohms and the latest resistors measure about .025 ohm.

1st September 2010, 06:57 PM	#202
Rodeodave diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: in the alps Blog Entries: 1	We should x-ray them. Do we know someone with the appropriate equipment and experience? __________________ Gravity - Making the G since 13.7 billion B.C.

1st September 2010, 07:16 PM	#205
Rodeodave diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: in the alps Blog Entries: 1	Found it: Grid - Screen Alignment (X-Rays) __________________ Gravity - Making the G since 13.7 billion B.C.

1st September 2010, 07:26 PM	#209
SY diyAudio Moderator Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Chicagoland Blog Entries: 1	jneutron: Yes, that's a crucial part of the detail. I would be absolutely embarrassed to put up data without information suitable for replicability. __________________ If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Info on Bybee Quantum Purifiers needed	Peter Daniel	Everything Else	68	19th December 2012 08:28 AM
Bybee Quantum Purifier Experience.	mrfeedback	Everything Else	321	27th August 2010 09:41 PM
diy bybee quantum purifiers?	mbl	Power Supplies	549	16th April 2010 10:38 PM
measurement and analysis tools	D_Dubya	Full Range	12	31st May 2008 02:07 PM


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

1st September 2010, 06:09 PM	#201
cbdb diyAudio Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Vancouver	I find it interesting that one of the biggest and most vocal supporters of Bybee, J Curl hasnt posted a single reply or comment. I guess if he helped design the test he wont be able to poo poo it later.

1st September 2010, 07:00 PM	#203
Pano diyAudio Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: North Carolina Blog Entries: 4	Yes we do. He has been x-raying vacuum tubes and posting here. Kenpeter is the guy.

1st September 2010, 07:14 PM	#204
john curl diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: berkeley ca	cbdb, I have been offline for several days, due to a computer crash. However, what is going on here is pointless, and redundant, except for exeric, who actually tried them. I have had similar experiences as he has. As far as the resistor is concerned, OF COURSE THERE IS A RESISTOR. There has always been a resistor that parallels the device. Whether on the inside or around the outside, there has ALWAYS been a resistor added. The early resistors measured .25-.3 ohms and the latest resistors measure about .025 ohm. They always did and they always will. However that is NOT the Bybee device. It measures several ohms, but its resistance is lost in the paralleling with the low R resistor. Now when you go beyond measuring the resistor, please let me know.

1st September 2010, 07:24 PM	#208
Pano diyAudio Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: North Carolina Blog Entries: 4	Or controlled listening tests.

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read