Bybee Quantum Purifier Measurement and Analysis

[jkeny]

No reading needed - there was no answer!

[abraxalito]

Originally Posted by SY

With steel leads (rather than the claimed copper), it would be expected to be noticeably inductive at very high (hundreds of megahertz) frequencies, just like any other component with steel leads.

Why would this be? Got a cite for the increase in inductance at high frequencies? Perhaps Mr Neutron would be able to chime in about internal vs external inductances but as far as I can see, the internal inductance tends towards zero as the frequency climbs.

[scott wurcer]

Originally Posted by jkeny

Just for the record - what was the answer? AFAIR you had devised a "very clever" way of testing for "electron velocity". So what had this to do with the claims??

I never saw this and can venture to say that SY never intended to measure "electron velocity". If one makes up absurd enough physics there is no way to devise a test. If that is the goal this exercise is a waste of time.

[SY]

Originally Posted by scott wurcer

I never saw this and can venture to say that SY never intended to measure "electron velocity". If one makes up absurd enough physics there is no way to devise a test. If that is the goal this exercise is a waste of time.

Actually, I did. Used the deflection of an oscilloscope beam as a crude detector. Agree on the last.

[abraxalito]

Originally Posted by scott wurcer

If one makes up absurd enough physics there is no way to devise a test. If that is the goal this exercise is a waste of time.

SY did devise a test though. And the point here is SY's claim that he tested the claims made for the device. That claim does not hold up because he invented 'electron velocity' all by himself. Its found nowhere that I can see in Bybee's claims - they speak of 'signal velocity'.

[auplater]

SY did say that somewhere in this morass of mushy mindlessness. I believe he laid to rest any potential extraordinary claims; at least he put up some results with details, more than any of the fanboys of Bybee Devices...

John L.

[scott wurcer]

Originally Posted by SY

Actually, I did. Used the deflection of an oscilloscope beam as a crude detector. Agree on the last.

OK, this is getting very confusing with terms like Fermi velocity and Cooper pairs getting thrown in at random just to obfuscate things.

[Pano]

Strange. I don't understand why this is so hard. If the Bybee actually does make this great improvement to the signal, shouldn't that be easily detectable by measurement?
From the reviews and testimonials, the audible results don't seem subtle. Shouldn't someone notice something in the measurements?

The Bybee is an electrical device, not acoustic. It has to have some sort of electrical effect to do what is claimed.

[SY]

Originally Posted by scott wurcer

OK, this is getting very confusing with terms like Fermi velocity and Cooper pairs getting thrown in at random just to obfuscate things.

Ya think?

It's performance art, it really is. I have to doff my hat to the master.

[MJL21193]

Originally Posted by scott wurcer

obfuscate

Word of the day.