|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#91 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
|
If possible I would like to see what effect the device has on higher frequency noise as well as audible range, say 10 to 100Mhz superimposed on some signals if at all possible.
My reason is to see how much effect they have on audio signals where digital noise may be present, be it fom a SMPS or other digital source. |
|
|
#92 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Someone else will have to do all but the crudest RF measurements. But the waveforms that John Curl posted were much lower frequency than that. That's where I'm concentrating- if there's an effect from RF that's audible, it will show up in the audible and (controversially) ultrasonic frequencies.
If a hundred dollar gizmo has no more or different effect on power supply and analog signal than a 2 cent bead (or for that matter, a 10 cent resistor) placed in the same spot, I think anyone who's not terminally gullible will have to draw the obvious conclusion.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
#93 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() jd
__________________
/Yes! Its out: Linear Audio Vol 5! I'm not an "accademic", just a plodder who loves a challenge - Ian Hegglun |
|
|
|
#94 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm game for the Bye Bee W fivesome experiment.
How many silver purifiers for that, you reckon ?
__________________
Not so much,.......if it says "ZM" in the corner. |
|
|
#95 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You'll need an answer for when they claim they weren't burnt in properly.
![]() How about just putting a 1k resistor in series and look for 4nV/rt-Hz, it's supposed to remove the noise right? ![]()
__________________
Clay is embedded in our subconscious. It has been there for at least 50,000 years. |
|
|
#97 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
![]() se
__________________
The Audio Guild |
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
"this quantum purification technology has proven that eliminating sub-audible noise—i.e., noise unmeasurable by typical test-bench instruments--" So it is already claimed that would should not be able to measure it. At least with "typical" equipment. However, this is an electrical device that is inserted in series. It may be used on AC lines: "The simplest AC modification is to primary power: Place the purifiers between the AC input -- typically an IEC socket -- and the transformer input. For best results the recommended procedure is to put a purifier on both the hot and the neutral leg;" Or it may be placed in the line level signal path: "For optimum performance improvement with RCA jacks, connect a purifier at (or as close as physically possible to) the positive terminal of the jack, and a second purifier on the return leg. Treating only the positive leg will also enhance performance, but to a lesser degree." They can also be used on speaker lines, near the driver: "To modify dynamic loudspeakers, the best possible results are obtained by connecting a purifier at both the positive and negative terminals of each driver." From the above statements we can clearly see that the device is meant to work in series with the current flow. A purifier on each both wires leading to the device is best. I really don't know how we can measure this "sub-audible noise." But listening tests, or viewing tests on video are supposed to reveal important improvements.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
#99 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
And yet JC presented measurements supposedly originating with Bybee which show gross, easy-to-measure changes. Heads, I win, tails, you lose?
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
#100 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mickey Mouzilla.
__________________
Not so much,.......if it says "ZM" in the corner. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Info on Bybee Quantum Purifiers needed | Peter Daniel | Everything Else | 68 | 19th December 2012 08:28 AM |
| Bybee Quantum Purifier Experience. | mrfeedback | Everything Else | 321 | 27th August 2010 09:41 PM |
| diy bybee quantum purifiers? | mbl | Power Supplies | 549 | 16th April 2010 10:38 PM |
| measurement and analysis tools | D_Dubya | Full Range | 12 | 31st May 2008 02:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |