|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
If we take the basic differentiator circuit (opamp configuration with a feedback resistor and a capacitor at the input), this circuit takes the derivative of the input voltage with respect to time:
output = d(input)/dt (let us assume that the RC scale factor is equal to 1) --> Let's say I have two signals, V1 and V2. I use two differentiator circuits to obtain d(V1)/dt and d(V2)/dt --> I then take an analog divider to divide d(V2)/dt by d(V1)/dt, to get d(V2)/d(V1) (the "dt" terms cancel out) Is this the same as taking the derivative: dV2/dV1? In other words, is this a way to take the derivative of a variable with respect to another variable? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
No, unfortunately. Your rationale applies using traditional algebraic (commutative, distributive) properties with sum and product, but not quotient.
At a point where v<>0, the quotient y = u/v of two differentiable functions is differentiable, and d/dx(u/v) = [v(du/dx) - u(dv/dx)] / v^2 An easier writing uses the ' single quote to represent the differential, so that (u/v)' = (vu' - uv') / v^2 Last edited by zigzagflux; 3rd July 2010 at 01:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Thanks zigzagflux - your answer makes perfect sense!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
|
Hi Rtarbell,
Actually, if V2 really is a function of V1, then it does work. Look up the chain rule. I think zigzagflux might have misread your question the same way I did at first. At first I thought you were asking if the derivative of (V2/V1) with respect to t was the same as the quotient of the two derivatives. But you were asking how to find the deriviative of V2 with respect to V1. Different animal. On the other hand, if you implement it, the method will become less and less accurate the more slowly V1(t) changes, because you will be dividing zero by zero so the actual result will be dominated by noise, and you will get nonsense at time-domain minima and maxima of V1(t). -- Eric |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
|
One more thing about op-amp differentiator circuits: they can be interesting to stabilize, because you are intentionally putting a low frequency pole in the negative feedback loop, which already has a dominant pole.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Theoretical OPT question | weinstro | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 10th November 2008 08:54 PM |
| Theoretical question concerning SPL /driver matching | p0lar | Multi-Way | 13 | 8th October 2008 10:11 PM |
| Theoretical sub/sat integation question | morbo | Subwoofers | 0 | 28th September 2005 10:37 PM |
| Horns theoretical question | johninCR | Multi-Way | 9 | 16th November 2004 11:08 AM |
| theoretical question.... | weissi | Digital Source | 15 | 23rd May 2003 05:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09281 seconds (74.28% PHP - 25.72% MySQL) with 10 queries |