Are solid state systems really changed/upset/disturbed by vibration? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th June 2010, 11:34 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Send a message via AIM to HuntTheShunt Send a message via MSN to HuntTheShunt Send a message via Yahoo to HuntTheShunt
Default Are solid state systems really changed/upset/disturbed by vibration?

Are solid state systems really changed/upset/disturbed by vibration?
__________________
DiyAudio
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2010, 11:49 AM   #2
wwenze is offline wwenze  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
How much is "really"?

If it is measurable but cannot be reliably heard, there will be those who say yes.

If it is not measurable, there will be those who don't trust measurements and believe that the ear is more sensitive, who say yes.

Bottom line - people will always believe something they want to believe.

In-car computers... if my ears process data more precisely than an Atom N270 then I can argue that the car engine disturbs the integrity of signal at the extent that a microprocessor still works while an audio amplifier doesn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2010, 12:10 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
picowallspeaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
I remember Sony some years ago in they're advertisement of one line claimed that their PCB were angled at about 5 to get rid of some of this parasitic phenomenon ,sort of a standing wave happening inside electronic enclosures. With a good chassis /pieces assembling I think it could be neglected.
Same approach but with many magnitude above HAPPENS inside cabinets ,so if the XO is placed inside the box ,same care must be taken to ensure the components,specially caps and coils, to be vibration proof.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2010, 03:07 PM   #4
alexcp is offline alexcp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
alexcp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Blog Entries: 37
From the web site of Douglas Self:

"Microphony is essentially something that happens in sensitive valve preamplifiers. If it happens in solid-state power amplifiers the level is so far below the noise it is effectively non-existent. Experiments on this sort of thing are rare (if not unheard of) and so I offer the only scrap of evidence I have. Take a microphone preamp operating at a gain of +70 dB, and tap the input capacitors (assumed electrolytic) sharply with a screwdriver; the preamp output will be dull thump, at low level. The physical impact on the electrolytics (the only components that show this effect) is hugely greater than that of any acoustic vibration; and I think the effect in power amps, if any, must be so vanishingly small that it could never be found under the inherent circuit noise."
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2010, 05:18 AM   #5
Enzo is offline Enzo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Crossovers inside the speaker box are a special case. You do need to prevent the parts from vibrating around, but the reason to do so is so they don't break off the board. Anyone working in pro audio can tell you that that is not a rare occurance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2010, 10:33 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
EBM_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
There are no moving parts inside of solid state devices. Except maybe the electrons. The mass of an electron is 9,109 382 15(45) * 10^-31 kg. The mass of a chipamp is what, 10 gramms? That equals 10-2 kg. It's 1,1 * 10^28 times heavier than an electron! As heavy mass equals inert mass, the electrons will move MUCH faster than the chipamp. So at such low frequencies as mechanic vibrations, the effect is not observable in any way known to mankind. As another example, the mass ratio proton/electron is 1834. Electrons will have moved a long time before the single proton of a hydrogen atom did, so atomic nuclei can be assumed as stationary in any case when it comes to electronic [in the sense of regarding electrons] "movements".
Also, the thermal noise by far outweights any noise possibly created through mechnical vibrations "acting" on electrons... As temperature equals kinetic energy, which IS movement, one should rather look in cooling solid state devices.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2010, 08:51 AM   #7
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
The brief answer is No, our equipement at work is basicaly communications in high vibration situations. The only problem we have is components coming loose from the board occasionaly, when not secured properly.
That said it is good engineering practice to minimise the exposure of any equipement to vibration.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solid Solid State Power Amplifier PMA Solid State 265 30th August 2011 08:04 PM
solid state just isn't doing it for me!! bonsai171 Tubes / Valves 9 13th July 2004 11:25 AM
The Solid State Wiki - Your solid state reference guide Jason Solid State 0 25th June 2002 05:26 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2