Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd June 2003, 04:15 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Venezuela
Default Test Chamber

Hi, I need to make an 'anechoic' test chamber to measure the response of different celular phones. The lowest frecuency to be reproduced in it is about 200 Hz. How big should I make this chamber?. I´m planning to cover the interior with auralex 4" or 3" studiofoam wedges to kill standing waves. Any suggestions?.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2003, 05:07 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
Default Looks like the NRC halves between 400 and 200.

I just looked at the specs for the 4" studio foam,

The down side seems to be that the NRC is only .62 at 200 Hz, half of what they spec for the rest of the voice band.

I think that Illbruck has a 6" Sonex product that might spec a little better. This portion of their sight seems to be off line at the moment.

If you can suspend the foam wedges a few inches in front of some duct liner or similar product you can significantly increase the low frequency absorption. Coarse wire screen makes a good surface to glue the foam to.

I imagine that the chamber needs to be tabletop. Do you have enough space and money to do a box-in-box? This would help to increase isolation.

There is a good article in this months Sound and Vibration about what some guys at Georgia Tech did to qualify a very large anechoic chamber that they built.

Sounds like a fun project. Are you using the Bruel and Kjaer cell phone test jig?
Attached Images
File Type: gif bruelkjaer.gif (17.7 KB, 79 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2003, 07:53 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
That's not a jig, that's a fixture.

Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing.
The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2003, 09:05 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Send a message via AIM to Austin
what type of measurements are you planning on taking? Do you need to test the response of the phones at a given point, or does the mic need to move during the measurements?

What are you hoping to get out of these measurements?

Right now I am qualifying the new semi-anechoic chamber at GA Tech. I was actually in there earlier today.

You should base the size of your chamber on the output you are expecting. From a cell phone I wouldn't expect high output, but the smaller you go, the less anechoic-like you can expect the response.

A good starting point is sturdy outside walls (MDF would be good for this). Make another wall inside the MDF walls (particle board would probably be better here). The walls should be separated enough that a layer or two of fiberglass insulation can fit between the walls. On the inside of the particle board walls use the acoustic foam wedges. If 4" is the biggest you can find, use it. If you can find bigger use that. You may want to put insulation on the outside of the MDF walls as well.

Wherever you put the chamber, make sure there is not much background noise. After you complete the chamber, you should do SPL measurements on the inside with a sound source on the outside. If the source on the outside has noticeable effect, you will need more damping from outside sound.

That should give you a good start. I'll see if I can find the journals describing anechoic chamber qualifications that I had to read when I first got my job.

Hope that helps,

Austin
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2003, 09:11 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
Austin,

I referenced the article about your work in an earlier post,

May 2003, Sound and Vibration

http://www.sandv.com/home.htm

Downloadable as PDF current issue article.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tweeter chamber slogan2112 Multi-Way 3 18th May 2008 05:30 PM
So, what exactly does a compression chamber do?? NV&H Full Range 2 5th February 2006 12:40 AM
Chamber Music to test speakers. RJ Music 4 27th December 2004 04:08 PM
Water chamber sub Guss Subwoofers 42 1st December 2003 01:58 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Page generated in 0.12476 seconds (60.64% PHP - 39.36% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio