|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Hi guys
I would like some help with this project please. I have a stereo headset in my motorcycle helmet which receives audio from a portable 12v mixing device. I wish to patch into the headset and take the stereo signal to the speakers and direct it into the mono mic jack of my helmet cam recorder. I have a P3189 line matching transformer to bring the speaker signal down to mic level specs but my question is how do I get the full stereo signal into the mono mic input and still retain the channel separation for music in the headset. I have seen a few suggestions for people asking about home stereo or high powered senarios but is this relevant for my low powered system. Obviously Im looking for the simplist solution as I need to have the the solution incorporated in the helmet cam wiring and carried in my jacket. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Rane Corp. has a paper on how to Wye "Y" stereo to mono:
Why Not Wye? You could wire a stereo output jack in parallel with the stereo input jack.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Thanks for your reply.
Ive had a thought that I could buy another line matching transformer and run one on each audio channel. These P3189s are isolators arent they? The circuit I have at the moment picks up the left channel + and runs it through a 100Uf 10V capacitor and then to one side of the P3189, the other side of the P3189 then takes the reduced isolated signal to the + of the mono mic input. If I was to put another capacitor and P3189 on the right channel and take the reduced output signal and directly couple it to the left channel output from the other P3189 would I have a "complete" mono signal to feed the mic input concidering that I am doing the mixing after the isolation of the transformers? Or would I still need to use the Wye config? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
The ETAL P3189 transformer appears to be a 1:1 voice only (not music) isolation transformer.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
|
I'd arrange 2 opamp unity gain buffers into an opamp summer. You can connect the buffers to the L & R signals without affecting them significantly.
Unity gain buffers and summers are straightforward circuits you can find on google. More-or-less any opamp will do, it's a fairly lo-fi app. w Power supply will complicate things a bit, dual rail would be easiest. What were you intending, to run off 12V? Last edited by wakibaki; 23rd April 2010 at 07:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
I was hoping not to have to use anything that requires a power source as this set up is on an offroad motorcycle that it is quite posible the bike and I will depart company on occasions (hence the wish to video record moments of stupidity, hopefully other peoples)
The smallest solution with the least wires is what Im looking for. The reason I thought about using the extra P3189 is that it doesnt require power, its small, its cheap and I could squeeze another into the box that houses the one I already have. Why is the P3189 not good for music? As you can probably tell I know very little about this stuff. As I said the mono circuit I have at the moment does work its just that the music sounds a very 'empty' which I assumed was just because I was recording only half the sound (one channel only). Could this be also that the P3189 will never let the music sound any good? Remember I am not looking for music perfection as the external noises are quite high, its just that I dont want to listen to the recording playback and hear only one channel of the music. Is it OK to couple the post transformer channels to make it mono? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Why is the P3189 not good for music? As you can probably tell I know very little about this stuff.
It's a design trade-off. A wider bandwidth for music would increase: Cost, weight & size. (cost being the most important)
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Tho I'm not quite sure I understand, Edcor makes small, cheap stereo to mono transformers. EDCOR - PC6400
Maybe too big for you. Seems like you should be able to do it with just a few resistors.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stereo to mono... | mcelaj | Solid State | 12 | 17th December 2011 04:57 PM |
| mono vs. stereo | schmalex | Chip Amps | 1 | 6th June 2005 01:51 PM |
| Stereo vs Mono | profuse007 | Car Audio | 4 | 6th March 2005 08:25 PM |
| Dual Mono v. Stereo | Papageoff | Chip Amps | 5 | 2nd November 2004 08:50 PM |
| stereo to mono | janey | Solid State | 3 | 12th December 2001 05:57 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12760 seconds (74.62% PHP - 25.38% MySQL) with 10 queries |