What might this mean for heat-sinks? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th June 2008, 10:42 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default What might this mean for heat-sinks?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0626150930.htm



7/10
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2008, 11:16 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Queensland Australia
Is an order of magnitude correct? That does seem like a lot.
__________________
"It was the Springtime of the year when aunt is calling to aunt like mastodons bellowing across primeval swamps." P.G. Wodehouse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2008, 11:58 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
Hmm, yes.... boiling.

It's not clear from this article exactly what has been achieved.

They can't be talking about the energy required to bring the water to boiling point, that's an established quantity called specific heat.

Similarly the energy required to go from water to steam is called the latent heat of condensation and is about 540 kcals/litre. So they must be talking about the efficiency of transfer of heat from the metal to the water.

If you put an immersion heater into water, the only place for the heat to go is into the water. So I guess they must be talking about combustion fed boilers. In which case you've got 2 interfaces, flue gas to metal and metal to water. The quicker you get the energy into the water, the steeper the heat gradient and quicker you can suck in more from the hot gas.

30-fold is a big increase tho', I'm surprised that existing systems waste that much energy. There may be an element of journalistic hype.

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 11:15 AM   #4
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
maybe they rediscovered cold fusion...
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 08:32 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
d to the g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: minimalopolis
Quote:
Originally posted by wakibaki


Similarly the energy required to go from water to steam is called the latent heat of condensation and is about 540 kcals/litre. So they must be talking about the efficiency of transfer of heat from the metal to the water.
Please note that this value is quoted at a specific pressure. (As is the temperature at which water boils). As this decreases the amount of water bonded to water, it decreases the enthalpy of vaporization. I'm not sure of the specifics, but that's at least how I read it.

Yes, it would also increase the amount of area available for heat conduction, providing that the water is more pure than any cooling water known to man. I'd give these nanowires about 3 hours before scaling made them inoperative.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 09:43 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally posted by shallbehealed


Please note that this value is quoted at a specific pressure.
I feel really remiss now, not having pointed that out. Somebody could have taken my numbers and made a fatal miscalculation at high altitude...

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 02:29 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
d to the g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: minimalopolis
Quote:
Originally posted by wakibaki


I feel really remiss now, not having pointed that out. Somebody could have taken my numbers and made a fatal miscalculation at high altitude...

w
Or someone could use the information I proffered as a possible explanation of the phenomena in the current discussion.

Or, ya know, they could just continue being wise regardless of their understanding of elementary thermodynamics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 11:53 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
BS.

The pressure is irrelevant.

I'm not interested in 'how it works' until I know 'what it does', and what it certainly doesn't do is 'reduce the amount of energy required to boil water'. Since the amount of energy recovered on condensation is always the same, anything else would mean you could build a perpetual motion machine.

If you've got a point to make, make it on your own account instead of trying to ricochet off my contribution.

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 12:04 PM   #9
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
the piffle was written by an eejit.

The energy required to boil water cannot be changed.
Similarly the energy required to raise the temperature of water cannot be changed.
The temperature of boiling can be changed with changes in atmospheric pressure and contaminants.

The heat transfer is maybe more efficient, but there are so many errors in the text and the science being reported that I for one would not bet my life on any part of these claims.

Let's see the original scientific text.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 12:50 PM   #10
croat47 is offline croat47  United States
diyAudio Member
 
croat47's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity

Thermal transfer is a function of the cross section the heat is moving through, yes? It seems all they have done is create more surface area on the bottom of a pan. Why so small? Who wants to clean a pot with a sponge-like structure on the bottom. It would be brutal on knuckles and not too sanitary.

Isn't the idea of fins on a heatsink to increase the surface area for more effecient transfer of heat from whatever you are cooling to whatever liquid/gas you want to dissipate the heat into? All they did was make a high SA heatsink on the bottom of a pan. No one changed the specific heat or any other law of thermodynamics.

Edited for grammar.
__________________
Regards,
Aaron
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Heat sinks gengis Swap Meet 8 17th March 2006 01:27 AM
Heat Sinks serengetiplains Parts 3 3rd January 2006 06:41 AM
heat sinks D3 Pass Labs 9 29th December 2003 07:19 AM
Heat sinks - going the other way jackinnj Everything Else 9 27th April 2003 05:01 PM
Big Heat Sinks dshortt9 Parts 15 4th November 2002 07:36 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2