|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
Master Burner
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
|
That sounds veeeery good. Interestingly, many people are turning that direction - USB to DAC. Of corse, I would prefer fire wire as well but as you explained well above...
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Yes, FireWire is unquestionably the superior interface. The problem for DIY is the software complexity - a device must have a lot of smarts in it because FireWire uses essentially a networking protocol. Perhaps a few thousand lines of code are needed, and there are limited open-source options so you would probably be writing all of that plus the OS drivers, then debugging it - it's a very big task for just a couple of people in their spare time.
USB's simplicity is therefore an asset for DIY. The lack of clock management is made up for by buffering on each end, and relying on two-way communication at high speed. In the days of USB 1 / "Full Speed" (what a horrible marketing-ism), there was barely enough bandwidth to handle 2 channels, so the clocking schemes were all badly compromised. USB 2 can band-aid the clocking problem for a single device attached to a single computer, but all the extra speed is no help if there is more than one audio device which needs to work together... keeping multiple devices in sync takes a time-stamped protocol over a fully synchronous full duplex physical interface like firewire.
__________________
- Chad. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Master Burner
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
|
Thank you Chad for the full explanation. Please keep us posted on your development. I would be very interested in such USB interface with exchangeable DAC capability.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows software for schematics and PCB | akis | Parts | 11 | 5th August 2008 07:12 AM |
| Zelscope for $20 - Windows software scope! | lineup | Equipment & Tools | 17 | 15th June 2007 12:40 AM |
| Soundeasy Design Software For Sale | mp006ltk | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th December 2006 08:58 AM |
| Questions about SoundEasy software package | Eric | Multi-Way | 5 | 25th August 2006 11:39 PM |
| A Software To Draw Blueprints Using Windows 98 | OMNIFEX | Multi-Way | 1 | 10th August 2004 04:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06857 seconds (68.78% PHP - 31.22% MySQL) with 10 queries |