Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th July 2007, 03:15 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
Default Holographic sound ?

Sometimes the sound produced by equipment , either electronic or acoustic , is supposed to produce 'holographic' sound.

Does this hold for all recordings or recordings that have 'holographic sounding content ' ? Which recordings have such content ?

I've noticed that my planar dipole has a different image compared to my boxed speakers . I attribute this to the very complex reflected sounds that come from the speakers with both front and out of phase rear radiation. It sounds attractive at times but certainly is an artifact of the speakers and not something 'in' the recording.

Would like to know others opinions on this .
Cheers.
__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 03:29 AM   #2
sam9 is offline sam9  United States
diyAudio Member
 
sam9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
If you want to know more about how dipoles work tale a look at linkwitzlab.com. One could charaterise dipoles asless complex in many respects rather more complex due to the "orthagonal null field". That a fancy name for a simple notion
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 03:52 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
Hi Sam,
Would you really think that dipoles have a less complex signal ?

We would now be dealing with additional reflected sounds caused by the rear radiation as well as the reflections from the signals from the front. This is in addition to the direct frontal sound. Without any reflective surface near the speaker , the radiation will be much simpler as you have indicated.
Rooms have a large number of reflective surfaces and often they are not simple in form. The multiple reflected signals should be quite complex. Differing delays too.

Not all that is covered in the well visited Linkwitz site. It's a great web site !
Cheers.
__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 04:06 AM   #4
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Dipoles trade the strong side reflections of typical forward-firing speakers in typical domestic environments for stronger, but more delayed rear reflections typically with less high frequency energy. Again, depends on the installation and speakers but I don't consider superiority of one over the other is clear cut.
BTW, for holographic sound try movies.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 05:19 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
"...............but I don't consider superiority of one over the other is clear cut....."

I think I agree with that . Every installation is unique in itself .

"....for holographic sound try movies......"

Sure. They sound great .
However I was refering to regular stereo recordings.

By the way in my listenig room there is a very long large window on one side wall and the wall on the other side is about 25 feet away .
__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 05:46 AM   #6
OzMikeH is offline OzMikeH  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Using the same recording if several people hear the same effect on different systems you have a clear example of Holographic sound.

I would define Holographic sound as sound sources appearing to come from somewhere other than along a line between your speakers. (I'm disregarding the false head type recordings here)

One example I heard was from Us and them, symphonic pink floyd, the track: comfortably numb.
I was at a friend's house, he has a high quality pair of single driver fullrange speakers. AER Mk1. I think the single driver bit might be important.

I played my MP3 player through them, a 128 kilobit file so we're talking a very poor quality signal source.

The horn section of the orchestra is very clearly behind and slightly above the speakers about 3/4 of the way across. But ONLY when sitting in the Sweet spot.

I don't hear this effect with headphones from the MP3 player or from the original CD. Only with speakers.

How the sound appears away from the imaginary line? I have no idea. It was interesting that the effect was still there when the music has been compressed with MP3, that might provide some clues.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 07:05 AM   #7
sandyK is offline sandyK  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Default Holographic Sound

There are countless recordings that give the illusion of a 3D soundstage. Unfortunately the majority of stereo amplifiers are lucky to give a soundstage that even extends past the width
of the speakers. Very few amplifiers are even able to give the illusion of sound behind the line of the speakers, or much in front of the speakers. There are numerous test discs that give a spoken narrative describing what you should be hearing from the various musical examples included. A good headfphone amplifier with quality headphones, is also capable of a 3D soundstage, however the front and rear depth obtained can never be as good as with speakers. The "Papa Doo Run Run" version of the hits of the Beachboys, is just one example of what can be achieved.Nimbus "Ambisonics" recordings are other examples. Unfortunately, most popular music is churned out using "panned mono" techniques, which results in the sound being spread in a straight line between the speakers. BTW, even "Beyonce-Naughty Girl" has an excellent 3D soundstage, as do some of the "making of" DVDs sometimes included with deluxe CD releases. e.g. Norah Jones-Not Too late" Deluxe version.

SandyK
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 12:43 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
This is great. Now we are getting a list of possible albums to use for checking out 'holographic' sound. Or should I be saying 3D sound ?
Thanks for the replies. Hope there will be more suggestions eventually.

In my case my dipole planar speakers give a far better 3D image than boxed speakers. But then that might just be a poor boxed speaker .

__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 12:44 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
I_Forgot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Default Re: Holographic Sound

Quote:
Originally posted by sandyK
There are countless recordings that give the illusion of a 3D soundstage. Unfortunately the majority of stereo amplifiers are lucky to give a soundstage that even extends past the width
of the speakers. Very few amplifiers are even able to give the illusion of sound behind the line of the speakers, or much in front of the speakers.
SandyK
You are mistaken. The amplifier is not the problem. Speaker placement and room acoustics are the problem. You must place the speakers to eliminate early reflections. In some rooms this is nearly impossible without acoustic treatment.

Amplifier performance is all pretty much the same, maybe with minor differences. Speakers and the room they are in are ALL different and require some effort to find optimal placement.

All the money in the world thrown at amps and cables won't add up to the effect of moving your speakers about 6".

I_F
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 01:50 PM   #10
el`Ol is offline el`Ol  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
I find the most obvious difference between dipoles an boxes can be heard with recordings done with omnidirectional microphones (rare). With boxes I find these recordings are superior than those done with cardioid microphones. With dipole speakers I find them too diffuse.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PC sound card sound chips kaluchka Chip Amps 6 20th June 2011 03:48 PM
Eighteen Sound (18 Sound) NSD 1095N Compression Drivers and XT1086 Horns opc Swap Meet 6 1st May 2009 03:48 AM
Roland VS-1 Sound Module - No Sound! jazzbee Instruments and Amps 1 3rd March 2006 08:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Page generated in 0.12003 seconds (79.21% PHP - 20.79% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio