|Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|22nd June 2007, 05:24 AM||#1|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
pros/cons of a chipamp VS a tube amp
I have mainly read/researched on tube amps and have recently started researching on chipamps.
From what I can gather, these are the pros/cons (not including sonic differences)
1: tube amps are generally more expensive. more power = higher expense (especially for SE!)
2. not sure of this but tube amp created more heat?
3. chipamp of course has less parts (some tube amp designs can get very complicated)
4. tube amps are deadly especially when using transmitting tubes. chipamps are kids-safe?
5. tube amps have more bling!
6. it seems to me that chipamps are easier to built because of the availability of PCBs and the low parts count.
What's the defining factor when choosing between a tube-amp and a chipamp?
ps. I am set on building a tube amp but it seems I need power to make speakers sing (and living in a small city in a small country, there's not many choices compared to someone living in the US). And it seems that chipamp can deliver that power cheaply!
|22nd June 2007, 05:53 AM||#2|
Join Date: May 2006
Start cheap and easy, build a chip amp.
Then when the bug has bitten you, you can go for the big, inefficient, hot, expensive tube amplifier.
|22nd June 2007, 02:18 PM||#3|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Re: pros/cons of a chipamp VS a tube amp
>> "1: tube amps are generally more expensive. more power = higher expense (especially for SE!)"
Yup, they are more expensive, mainly due to transformer and tube costs.
>> "2. not sure of this but tube amp created more heat?"
Yup, way more, mainly running in Class A, and with in-built heaters !
>> "3. chipamp of course has less parts (some tube amp designs can get very complicated)"
Yup, and they are a good place to start your DIY experience.
>> "4. tube amps are deadly especially when using transmitting tubes. chipamps are kids-safe?"
Potentially deadly. However some tubes run off of low voltages (12 to 36-ish Volts).
>> "5. tube amps have more bling! "
…and some look like a pile of cr4p even by 1930's standards…
>> "6. it seems to me that chipamps are easier to built because of the availability of PCBs and the low parts count."
There are many decent tube kits available. The main reason chip-amps are easy to build is because of the low complexity as you have stated.
>> "anything else?
What's the defining factor when choosing between a tube-amp and a chipamp?"
You are the defining factor. Build what *you* want to build. Define your objectives. Assess the alternatives. Make a balanced choice. Do it. Enjoy it.
Note that your first objectives might include "learning how to do it safely and well" and not just "I want it to sound wonderful".
Remember that chip amps are cheap and they can always be used on a second system (bedroom, study…) if you build a second amp for more experience or a different sound in your main system.
"You are very welcome", said Gordy, urging jarthel closer to the chipamp route...
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|pros/cons of a 845 VS 211||jarthel||Tubes / Valves||2||18th June 2007 01:57 PM|
|TL vs MLTL, pros and cons||Tomac||Multi-Way||5||29th December 2004 01:55 PM|
|Filterless DAC - pros and cons?||mr_push_pull||Digital Source||1||11th August 2004 03:56 PM|
|Transformer I/V stage, pros&cons.||Brian Guralnick||Digital Source||59||13th February 2004 02:15 AM|
|Pros and Cons of this technique?||G||Tubes / Valves||35||23rd October 2003 06:37 PM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|