|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
What is the Thermal Conductivity of Kapton compared to aluminum?
I have seen thermal conductivity charts where aluminum is about 250, but Kapton is not listed. I have looked up Kapton and gives a number, 4.3 or thereabouts, but I am not sure if the units used are exactly the same as those used to measure aluminum. For instance, in some loudspeaker specs, diaphragm mass is given in grams. In other specs, in kilograms. In the same way, I don't know if the specs I get for Kapton are measured in the same units as those which produced 250 for aluminum. Does anyone know? PS: While we are at it, are there any other common plastics with a thermal conductivity nearly equal to or perhaps greater than Kapton?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SiliconValley
|
Kapton 0.12 to 0.37 W/m_K - variation based upon percentage of absorbed water Dupont Datasheet
Aluminum 240 W/m_K Materials Handbook |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Berlin
|
Hi,
Quote:
Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
Hmmm, I was under the impression that Kapton was used in voice coils because it had good thermal conductivity for a plastic. Guess not, although it does seem to be more thermally conductive than many other plastics.
Are there any plastics which could loosely be called thermal conductors instead of insulators? I realize it is unlikely any plastic would have a thermal conductivity to rival metal, but is there a plastic with a rating of 4 or so?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Berlin
|
I'd wonder why. Where should the voice coil former conduct the heat to - there's no sink.
Conductivity would stress the glue joints between coil former and cone, but not spread the heat farther away. AFAIK, the heat is ventilated (into the air gap) and radiated (and sunk into the pole plate). That's why ventings and heat spreaders on magnets and baskets are commonly found on professional speakers, particularly on neodymium drivers... Cheers, Sebastian. PS: I guess you need the plastic heat conductivity for something other than voice coils. I'm afraid I can't answer your original question...
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
I figured that if the voice coil former was thermally conductive, it would act like a heat sink and conduct the heat into the air gap. It might make only a small difference, but every little bit helps, I thought.
But you are correct, I did have a different application in mind. As it turned out, there is at least one manufacturer of thermally conductive plastics, (both electrically conductive and non electrically conductive), with a rating between 1 and 20 W/m_K. Source Although what this actual substance is, I don't know.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Tetsujin
diyAudio Moderator
|
Like sek said, the choice of Kapton (or similar polyimides like Upilex) is because of the thermal stability, unusually high for a plastic. One sacrifices thermal conductivity and specific heat for low mass. Thermally conducting plastics generally are made by loading up a conventional plastic with a thermally conductive filler (like BeO), and are much heavier, not to mention less thermally stable.
edit: The site you linked to lists the thermal conductivities of several materials. The filled polymers have thermal conductivities 10 to 200 times lower than aluminum.
__________________
"We all feel like that, Reggie, now and then, especially when Spring is upon us, but few of us would care to put it on our cards." — Sir Archibald Clerk-Kerr |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
The small disadvantage regarding thermal conductivity is well worth having. A lighter voice-coil leads to better efficiency and therefore smaller thermal losses.
Regards Charles |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Biasing/thermal compensation of Thermal Trak transistors | Bob Cordell | Solid State | 149 | 31st October 2008 10:36 PM |
| Voice Coil Formers... Kapton vs Nomex vs Aluminum vs GF/TIL | OlogyAudio | Multi-Way | 3 | 1st June 2007 03:27 AM |
| help with Thermal Impdeance vs. Thermal Conductivity | Eric | Pass Labs | 4 | 22nd July 2005 08:23 PM |
| Q: Kapton vs Aluminum VC-former and different wire | Ultima Thule | Multi-Way | 17 | 22nd June 2005 06:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09325910 seconds (77.59% PHP - 22.41% MySQL) with 10 queries |