|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I've never used a scope but want to try learning. I'm building a portable headphone amp and want to learn to use the oscope to tweak it. These look like some great programs. Any thought on which would be better for a novice?
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
It's difficult to read the (linear?) scale but it looks like 10% 2nd harmonic? Jan Didden
__________________
/Yes! Its out: Linear Audio Vol 5! I'm not an "accademic", just a plodder who loves a challenge - Ian Hegglun |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Quote:
What do you mean by “PC noise”? My build in PCI card has actually less noise than my external USB soundcard. Measured spurs in loop-trough are below –120 dB and are below distortion components. It is actually not an oscilloscope but my favourite program for doing audio analysis is ARTA. Very well written, easy to use, very complete and works with almost any soundcard. The free demo version has no limits except you cannot save to files. But you can however copy the results from your screen and save them through any image program Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: S Yorkshire OK
|
Quote:
Kit, $140 Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
€120 ~ $140 .... yes, this is NOT too Expensive What I would like is some good solution aimed for Audio Anlog signals. Most products out there are, naturally, good for digital signals and for collecting data from sensors and monitoring data for longer time. And the more close to Audio Hifi Quality we get( above average mp3 level ) the fewer good alternatives in an acceptable price range - for normal Diy Builders doing this for a hobby. Looking for good free alternatives it most sure not the way. But we may find some applications with good resolution in bits & time (at least 16bits ,48 kilo samples per second; preferably 24bits, 192 ksps) at an acceptable proce budget, 'for normallly rich people'. There are some really good soundcards for PC, out there! With true high hifi. Which ones of those, include a software for 'oscilloscope like measurings'? ... this will also be good for direct PC-Recordings of my old Vinyl Collections, for to burn (with little compression) to CD or DVD Regards lineup - has still got a cheap simple Creative Live soundcard... but will possibly soon invest in a super audio card (with RIAA phono amplifier) ================================================== Info, Wikipedia, Sampling (signal processing): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samplin..._processing%29 Quote:
__________________
lineup |
||
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
|
http://www.parallax.com/detail.asp?product_id=28014 = " ... USB 1.1 Support (no additional power supply required!) ..." ...
You know that all that is really needed for an audio 'scope is a decent ADC / DAC and the software to display the incoming signal properly with "freeze frame" capability.
__________________
Over compression is a problem with modern CD recordings |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
Simple as that. Yes, why complicate things ( KISS = Keep It Simple Simple ) Now, A good soundcard for Audio means to me: - It have a good ADC/DAC onboard high resultion(24bits) and fast sampling - It has preferably good input/output possibilities, - digital SPDIF koaxial and TOSLINK is a minimum - analog RCA Phono and stereo 3mm jack would be good - maybe more professional analog inputs, like XLR etc. - Good software support for the buyer .. upgrades, online downloads etc. - There is no disadvantage (maybe is best!) if the soundcard is external This would make connections easy, instead of back of PC. Will maybe also exclude some disurbance from PC digital frequencies/powersupply junk. lineup
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
|
" ... A good soundcard for Audio means to me:
- It have a good ADC/DAC onboard high resultion(24bits) and fast sampling - It has preferably good input/output possibilities, - digital SPDIF koaxial and TOSLINK is a minimum - analog RCA Phono and stereo 3mm jack would be good - maybe more professional analog inputs, like XLR etc. - Good software support for the buyer .. upgrades, online downloads etc. - There is no disadvantage (maybe is best!) if the soundcard is external ..." ... likewise I'm sure ... and as long as the "wish list" is being writ large: make mine a FireWire 800 interface so's it can handle something bigger, badder and broaderband than USB2, Gigabit EtherNet or iSCSI / Fibrechannel / whathaveyou ...
__________________
Over compression is a problem with modern CD recordings |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SoundEasy (& other windows audio software) via VMWare Fusion? | hifiZen | Everything Else | 12 | 28th November 2008 08:04 PM |
| Windows software for schematics and PCB | akis | Parts | 11 | 5th August 2008 07:12 AM |
| Great deal on Digital scope. Is this enough scope? | hifimaker | Pass Labs | 1 | 1st May 2007 09:59 PM |
| A Software To Draw Blueprints Using Windows 98 | OMNIFEX | Multi-Way | 1 | 10th August 2004 04:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |