|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
The Newegg scope should be fine for isolated line testing and general audio work in low voltage amps.Do not plud the probe directly into the wall outlet. The 400 volt maximum input rating is too low for poking around inside tube amps without a 10:1 voltage divider scope probe.
Quote:
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
In another forum, Occam wrote:
Powervar acquired OneAC in 2011. I'm not positive, but the PowerVar line viewer appears to be the same as my unit, a OneAC line viewer, model 103. A 103 just sold on EBay for $90 - OneAC Line Viewer 103 | eBay The unit outputs common and normal mode noise on 2 different BNCs, as well as the ac waveform on another bnc, hence, the (ideal) requirement for a 2 channel scope for viewing. The input is a standard 15amp IEC inlet. Powervar PP115 manual - http://pdf.textfiles.com/manuals/STA...er%20Probe.pdf it matches my OneAC 103 manual, no longer online. FWIW, Paul You can skip the first posts in the thread: 6 Moons reviews - Blue Horizon Mains Noise Analyzer
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Thanks! Huck50
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
expert in tautology
diyAudio Member
|
I think I said it earlier, but the issue with using a transformer to look at the AC waveform is that it will likely scrub all the higher frequency artifacts that are out of the bandwidth of the xfmr... like RFI and anything in the higher ultrasonic range.
I guess that is ok, but a bunch depends on what sort of distortion you want to see. So, definitely it is ok to start with the output transformer and see what is there, it's somewhat safer since you have a stepdown ratio and lower voltage at the output side.
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com [...2SJ74 Toshiba bogus asian parts - beware! ] -- Btw, I don't actually know anything, FYI --
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal
|
What about this little jig and then connected to the scope at the right side after the diodes?
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
First thing with that jig is to heed the 110 percent thing mentioned earlier. The second thing is those diodes will only convert the line signal into a square wave. Replace the diodes with a 100 ohm resistor and you have a voltage divider as discussed earlier. A quick calculation says the 10k is dissipating 1.4 watts - scale the resistor power rating accordingly.
If it's important to detect DC offset on the line (this would be useful to know - even a little DC can cause transformer saturation and overheating), you should have a direct connection instead of the capacitor. Last edited by benb; 6th January 2013 at 05:09 AM. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
I tossed together this circuit in LTSpice - it should have the bandwidth of whatever opamp you use. The output is the same whether you ground either side of V1 or leave it floating. All that chances it the currents through R1 and R4. It does pull about 1mA from the line which would presumably go through the ground pin of the oscilloscope or computer's ground connection to the power line, which should be low enough not to trip a GFI.
Of course, remove the .txt extension to load it into LTSpice. linemonitor.JPG linemonitor.asc.txt Last edited by benb; 7th January 2013 at 12:40 AM. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
|
It is also benefititial to record the mains over a period of time to record brown outs, voltage fluctuations due to loads on your mains etc, and if you are lucky someone near you will be using power line communications, it just adds more noise.
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You can use an inductive pickup coil near the cord to pick up signals on that cord. -RNM
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Victoria,TX
|
Another suggestion is to use a current sensor. It will give you a milivolts output signal.
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "WTB" "The Wire AMP" Class A/AB Power Amplifier based on the LME49830 with Lateral | enantra | Swap Meet | 3 | 23rd December 2012 06:36 PM |
| "Quick and dirty" sealed subwoofer - HELP! | Lenin21 | Subwoofers | 19 | 4th October 2011 09:29 PM |
| So now I have to worry about "dirty electricity"?? | amt | Everything Else | 47 | 11th March 2011 06:57 PM |
| Fender Frontman 212R-Clean channel sounds "dirty" | EronSilva | Instruments and Amps | 5 | 24th January 2011 05:50 PM |
| Early Punk Fans: "Talk Dirty" Lyrics? | kelticwizard | Music | 0 | 30th October 2004 05:49 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |