Active notch filter for THD+N measurements - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Equipment & Tools

Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th July 2011, 09:53 AM   #11
askii2 is offline askii2  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Pune
Quote:
Originally Posted by coluke View Post
Well, I hope he's not going to see exactly this, of course (x-over residuals from an LM358-based unity gain follower without pull-down resistor - SVF-based auto tuning/nulling notch, stable notch depth ~100dB, post-notch gain +40dB).

L.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchisholm View Post
Yes, if you're at all serious about making measurements then drop the LM358. The TL07x series outperform it across the board at about the same cost, and the NE5534 beats the pants off it while still falling in the "low cost" category.
LM358 is definitely off . I had read about cross-over distortion. Wasn't aware of how exactly it looks like as a difference wrt. the original.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchisholm View Post
On the other hand - if this notch filter is used as a front-end to a spectrum analyzer or wavemeter that already has a resolution of -60 dBc (or much better), then you are starting to get into the range where your measurement capability is comparable to state-of-the-art performance.
This is definitely a good approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchisholm View Post
My fear would be that the switched-capacitor filter will add corruption to the signal and limit your measurement floor far short of where you're trying to get.
Has anyone on this forum used switched-capacitor filters for audio work? Are they so bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchisholm View Post
For background information, you should probably take a look at Dick Moore's page, "About THD Analyzers", as well as his home-constructed notch filter at "Active Twin-T Notch Filter". The definitive article for DIY THD analyzer construction is Bob Cordell's 1981 series, "Build a High-Performance THD Analyzer (Part1, 2, and 3)", available on the Cordell Audio website at < CordellAudio.com - Home >.
Dale
A lot of excellent reading stuff. Need to digest it over a period of time. It'll be helpful in building my own state of the art THD measurement tools. Thanks.

Last edited by askii2; 15th July 2011 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Corrected quoted references
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2011, 11:24 AM   #12
askii2 is offline askii2  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Pune
Update - Surprisingly I found crosstalk to be the most prominent problem of my amp. While I was trying THD+N measurements as outlined above, these aren't necessary now. With a high crosstalk, It's obvious that my off-the-shelf bought amplifier needs a replacement. So now I'll immediately start working on building a my own amplifier. Read more below.

To start with I installed ARTA (free, so can't post any measurements or graphs here) on my laptop. Then to determine my measurement capability, I did ARTA's THD+N measurement by using a loopback from line out of an external USB DAC to laptop's line in. THD+N number shown by ARTA hovered around 0.3%. Since it varies a lot between 0.2% to 0.35% most of the times and shoots up to 20% at regular intervals, I concluded that 0.3% is my measurement floor. The shooting up is because of clock noise of the DAC, so that can be ignored.

If I plugged in my amplifier from line-out to line-in, ARTA's THD+N doesn't show any observable difference. So I concluded that my amplifier had to have a THD+N lower than 0.3% and can't be measured by my present setup.

I then decided to take the shorter path of measuring THD+N - {getting rid of original signal by connecting load between the two channels with one channel grounded} instead of the more difficult notch measurement. As a trial step before this, I connected two 5Ohm 20W resistances to two channel output (output and ground each), then shorted one channel input and connected ARTA signal generator to the other channel. Measurements on the channel with ARTA signal generation coincided with my previous measurements. To my surprise a spectrum measurement on the shorted channel showed a 35-40dB rise at the fundamental frequency when volume knob was turned to 12OClock position. To confirm this I repeated by connecting a speaker on the shorted channel. The speaker played the tune (and music as well when I used a CD player in place of the ARTA signal generator).

I guess this 35-40dB can be concluded as the cross-talk. The 35-40dB level stays constant with volumes higher than 12)Clock. That's a really high cross-talk and will significantly affect stereo image. At this point I have completely lost faith in my present off-the-shelf bought amplifier. Need to build my own state of the art amplifier right-away .
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Build -- Active Twin-T notch filter for distortion analysis richiem Equipment & Tools 302 16th August 2014 11:44 PM
Passive Notch Filter For Thd Measurement fotios Solid State 8 7th July 2008 07:29 AM
Active Notch Filter design needed Vikash Multi-Way 63 21st May 2007 05:14 PM
Noise out of active notch filter reins Multi-Way 0 6th July 2006 07:34 PM
Active notch filter 5th element Solid State 7 6th February 2004 10:06 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2