|Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|21st July 2011, 12:48 PM||#121|
Hi George, some more measurements as requested, though I'm not sure what to make of them! Certainly not what I was expecting for the 1uF caps.
I did these on the breadboard, so it may be mucking up the measurements. perhaps I really need to solder.
the three BC's first.
single measured 0.22 or 0.21 ohms
two in series measured 2.7 ohms
three in series measured 4.4 ohms
two in parallel measured 0.02 ohms
three in parallel measured 0.02 ohms
I then tried 4 X 1uf Axons (polypropylene).
single measured 0.16 ohms
two in series 2.6 ohms
three in series 4.3 ohms
four in series 5.8 ohms
two in parallel measured 0.01 ohms
three in parallel measured 0.03 ohms
four in parallel measured 0.06 ohms
a single 3.6 uF axon measures 0.01 ohms
now the two siemens 100nf
single 17 ohms
two in series 29 ohms
2 in parallel 8.3 ohms
and finally evox rifa 100nF caps
single 16 ohms
2 in series 27 ohms
3 in series 42 ohms
4 in series 57 ohms
5 in series 73 ohms
2 in parallel 7.7 ohms
3 in parallel 4.9 ohms
4 in parallel 3.4 ohms
5 in parallel 2.7 ohms (very close to the two 1uf in series results)
and just for fun 2 X silmic II 1uF
single 2.8 ohms
in series 6.2 ohms
in parallel 0.73 ohms
I'm not going to try and make any sense of all that tonight
|3rd November 2011, 12:21 PM||#122|
The only thing I'm not sure about is using two bnc's for the input + and - I'm not that familiar with using opamps, and don't really understand how that is to work. do I only use two inputs when looking at the difference between two signals or is it for balanced input? sorry for my stupid question
anyway here is a picture of the first steps familiar but not quite the same
|3rd November 2011, 09:05 PM||#123|
OK I've slept on it, and figure the way to use the two inputs is to only use the hot of each for connecting to the circuit under test, and only use the sheild on the box end. +ve one to the point of interest, -ve one to the zero volts or earth of the circuit under test. I guess this should remove the possibility of any ground loops between the DUT and the device which is taking the output.
|21st November 2011, 10:10 AM||#124|
I've finished the instrumentation amp tonight I haven't actually tried it out yet, but I did perform a rudimentary health check. I hooked up the battery (which needs a bit of a charge) and checked for dc offset on the output with the multimeter set to 200mV DC. My voltage divider is not giving totally symetrical readings, but it is pretty close.
1X 0.0 mV
10 X -0.1 mV
50 X -0.8 mV
100 X -1.6mV
1000 X 16 mv
So it looks like the gain settings are pretty much spot on (except for 10X which I was expecting because my resistors didn't work out exactly to 5.49K.
It would appear that I have about -16uV offset on the input. Measurements were taken with both inputs floating.
here is a picture of the guts
Getting too late tonight to try and measure something tonight, but soon
Edit: power input is a bit dodgy in that I used a stereo 3.5mm jack, reason being I couldn't find an insulated dc socket (I need to keep the -ve of the battery floating and the virtual zero volts tied to the case).
Last edited by wintermute; 21st November 2011 at 10:12 AM. Reason: comment on dodgy power socket.
|29th November 2011, 08:19 PM||#125|
Sorry for my delayed answer.
You've done a great construction. A very good alum. housing too.
About your question on how to connect the two inputs, you are correct. You can use the "differential" mode , as well as the "single ended" connection (see attached sketch).
Have a look at the AD 620 data sheet. If I remember well, the (-) Input is less noisy than the (+) Input. If this is so, the (-) Input should be connected to the weaker signal when you use the "differential" connection When you use the "single ended" connection, the (-) Input should be connected to the "hot" signal and the (+) Input to the GND.
Keep on working (and walking )
["Second Law is a bitch." - SY] ["The Road To Heaven:Specify the performance & accept the design. The Road To Hell:Specify the design & accept the performance"-Bruno Putzeys]
Last edited by gpapag; 29th November 2011 at 08:22 PM.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|implementing HT bypass in preamp||dvenardos||Solid State||10||31st March 2009 08:08 PM|
|Experience implementing Seas DXT tweeter?||TurboFC3S||Multi-Way||6||19th September 2008 05:06 PM|
|Implementing a Rumble Filter before the Amp?||Bogie||Subwoofers||12||2nd January 2006 10:48 PM|
|Seeking advice on implementing opa627 I/V stage||quantran||Digital Source||0||30th March 2005 07:48 AM|
|implementing side-firing subs into towers||bonsai171||Multi-Way||1||25th February 2004 03:14 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|