|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, crumbling wasteland
|
Hello all, I'm in the process of getting an old computer together for taking measurements from my workbench. My sound card is an old Sblive! model. Connecting the output to the input and doing a frequency sweep results in this plot.
Are the peaks caused by the input coupling caps? I used an external signal generator and verified the input against an oscilloscope to make sure the line out was not the cause. The caps are 0603 sized and my meter is unable to read their value in circuit. Has anyone found similar results? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Is the SB live the card that would always resample it's input to the card's native rate?
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
|
It seem a silly question, but are you sure you're not accidentally mixing the direct 'WAVE' signal with the 'LINE IN' signal within the sound card before feeding that to the output? If so, it would cause peaks and troughs in the response I would imagine. (I did something similar in my own amplifier distortion-measuring experiments recently, coming up with some mysteriously bad distortion results, and some very unpleasant sounds from the amp I was testing). The solution was to ensure that input and output were just 'LINE IN' and 'WAVE' respectively using the mixer applet.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
one called Visual Analyser and played with it.Even without any connection or input.Of course the signal generator is selected for a 1khz. and when I click ON The spectrum plot a wave which is actually the noise floor of the soundcard which is soundblaster live like yours. The plot averages around -120db similar to yours.So I think the bottom plot is the noise floor of the other channel and the top trace is the other channel of the result of the frequency sweep.or it could be the scope trace. I think you should read the documentation of your software to counter check if you done the right procedures and settings,if this is any help at all. Ps noise is a random signal so it has peaks , it's normal.As to whether you can lower the noise floor further I think you must be and expert in electronics to mod the board as I can only see decoupling caps even then changing them may not be much help unless you can zero in what frequency and calculate the correct size caps to filter it.Anyway at about -120db noise floor the soundblaster can make some decent measurements. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, crumbling wasteland
|
Running that same sweep with the "what u hear" option results in a perfectly flat response. This Sblive card is pretty old and starting to have issues anyhow.
I think its time to look for a decent 24bit 96khz card. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gyrator Frequency Response? | SGregory | Tubes / Valves | 96 | 7th December 2010 04:25 AM |
| Frequency response | 2litre | Analog Line Level | 5 | 31st May 2006 07:00 PM |
| frequency response | pmarcouxx | Digital Source | 2 | 20th July 2005 07:43 PM |
| Doubts on Phase Response and Frequency Response | dumrum | Multi-Way | 11 | 5th April 2004 10:39 AM |
| Frequency Response program | JasonDelta | Multi-Way | 10 | 13th February 2004 01:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08115 seconds (78.15% PHP - 21.85% MySQL) with 11 queries |