|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
|
OK folks, problem solved. Unfortunately not without significant embarrassment on my behalf.
So the first thing that I did was to replace the 4.7uf cap with a 470uf cap - this led to a significant improvement in the noise, almost perfect but not quite. I then revisited the 79L12 (IC4) which had the ripple on the out pin. I decided to replace this IC - Eureka, perfect!! I then put the 4.7uf cap back in, once again perfect. Problem solved 100% with a sharp beautiful trace. So what went wrong? Here's the embarrassing part. I presumed it was just a dud IC but then I looked closely at the little bugger. It was labeled BC548C (tiny writing). The BC584C is an amplifier as far as I can tell. So, I figure I was taking the small ripple from the smoothing caps and amplifying it onto pin 11 of the 8038. Sorry for wasting everyone's time and thanks for all the responses. To my defense, the BC548C did come out of a fresh pack from Farnell labeled 79L12. All the others are correct. The other problem of course is this solid state stuff - you could never mistake a 845 for and EL34 Anyhow, I learned a lot and despite (or because of) the frustration had a lot of fun. Cheers, Rob PS Post above should read pin 11 not 8 |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
Fantastic- ten points for finding it! I always figure if nothing ever goes wrong, I'm not doing enough.
Best, Conrad
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
I know it is not the topic, but why use the ICL8038 ?
It is obsolete, difficult to get, has only 1% THD, .... I am sure a 24-bit sound card will do better. Or if you only need sine wave, then I would recommend the func gen in Bob Cordell's Distortion Analyser. My implementation of the Cordell Distortion Analyser Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
Why the 8038 - 1. There was a nice simple little circuit for it on the web with a PCB template. 2. I wanted a stand alone function generator. 3. I could not find a simple option using a more modern chip. 3. Being obsolete has it's advantages - They are no longer needed where a friend of mine works and he was able to put his hand on a couple! Cheers, Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
because it is obsolete I have made a functiongenerator using "normal" components such as opamps and so on, converting a triangle to a sine wave.
if you are interested I can look for the schema, somewhere in my pc |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for an used function generator | Eva | Swap Meet | 0 | 21st February 2008 06:56 AM |
| function generator | d1camero | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 27th January 2008 06:26 AM |
| Software function generator & SMD problem | eeka chu | Digital Source | 1 | 3rd June 2004 08:40 PM |
| Have you seen my new function generator | jwb | Pass Labs | 1 | 28th August 2002 06:06 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09459 seconds (72.77% PHP - 27.23% MySQL) with 11 queries |