Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Equipment & Tools
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st September 2009, 12:27 PM   #1
speedie is offline speedie  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Default db meter

I was wondering if crossover verification could be achieved by the use of only a sound pressure meter
Would this idea work?
With testing for db drop in xo area could we say remove the minus lead from each driver to get readings i.e. check woofer only followed by each driver in order
It seems to me that db should be similar to say series or parallel concepts
I guess what I am trying to say is that if there is a db variation then the crossover is not a flat response?
Would anyone like to shed a little light!
Cheers speedie
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2009, 01:08 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedie View Post
I was wondering if crossover verification could be achieved by the use of only a sound pressure meter
Would this idea work?
With testing for db drop in xo area could we say remove the minus lead from each driver to get readings i.e. check woofer only followed by each driver in order
It seems to me that db should be similar to say series or parallel concepts
I guess what I am trying to say is that if there is a db variation then the crossover is not a flat response?
Would anyone like to shed a little light!
Cheers speedie
Would work in princliple, your reasoning is spot on.
But to get meaningfull results you must do it in free field (unless you have an anechoic chamber in your cellar), and make sure that you don't change anything to the speaker pos and mike pos between measurements.

You can also do it with the complete speaker, just take readings at small freq steps through the xover to see how it looks. Separate curves from each driver do not always add up algebraically because there's phase shift between them that you won't see with the SLM. So, come to think of it, only the last method is usefull.

jd
__________________
/“If controlled, repeated tests come out the same again and again - that's Nature saying you're right"
Meet me at Linear Audio
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2009, 12:55 AM   #3
speedie is offline speedie  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Default Slm

Thanks JD
It is an interesting concept, if we look at a crossover response graph, the intersection is always at a lower point than the flat line that we are tring to achieve so having said that where does the extra level of noise come from?
as one rolls off the other picks up, graphically there is a lower db rating
cheers Speedie
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to make this esr meter work with 250uA Panel meter dytln_02 Everything Else 2 27th January 2007 10:13 PM
inductance meter from a cheap meter? jarthel Parts 3 22nd September 2006 05:37 AM
Making a milliAmp meter, become a Volt meter redrabbit Power Supplies 11 26th May 2006 07:51 PM
t-amp vu meter and volt meter question.... rectaacies Class D 7 3rd February 2006 11:22 AM
VU Meter metal Chip Amps 3 11th July 2005 01:21 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.07172799 seconds (72.54% PHP - 27.46% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio