USB is not synchronous. Firewire was, but it is gone. It is my understanding in real studios they use Ethernet and run a separate master clock. Way out of the DIY range.
I have a question about the QA400's channel matching:
Can anyone tell me if it's normal to have several dB discrepancy between the Left and Right channel THD readings in loopback mode?
See pics attached - notice the discrepancy grows as the FFT length is increased.
Can anyone tell me if it's normal to have several dB discrepancy between the Left and Right channel THD readings in loopback mode?
See pics attached - notice the discrepancy grows as the FFT length is increased.
Attachments
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Thanks Demian.
I measured the output with a high bandwidth true-RMS'r -- which lead me to put the QA400 on my HP3577A. Here's a 1kHz tone, from 100Hz to 1MHz:
I measured the output with a high bandwidth true-RMS'r -- which lead me to put the QA400 on my HP3577A. Here's a 1kHz tone, from 100Hz to 1MHz:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
My AP is in for service, so I used the AA5001 to measure the continuous tone THD+N% of the QA400. Without the "Audio Band" filter it was not very good.
I would change out the BNC connectors for insulated variety so they aren't part of the chassis, use an isolated USB adapter with a separate wall wart power supply (not the USB power), put some ERS paper inside top and bottom over the digital circuitry and allow for a knurled banana jack so the chasis could be grounded. Just my 2 pfennigs.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I would change out the BNC connectors for insulated variety so they aren't part of the chassis, use an isolated USB adapter with a separate wall wart power supply (not the USB power), put some ERS paper inside top and bottom over the digital circuitry and allow for a knurled banana jack so the chasis could be grounded. Just my 2 pfennigs.
Using a filter the measurement is for my understanding useless
The measurement will also whole environment, dependent of RF sources and sinks
Hp
@kevinkr -- i put a ferrite clamp on the USB cable and the noise is still there.
@HpW -- i think that there's a wide-spread perception that nothing happens above 20kHz, you may not be able to hear a pure tone above 20kHz, but you can recognize the artifacts of noisy switchers, etc ... the THD+N measured on the AA5001 is 0.633% with no low pass filters switched in.
@HpW -- i think that there's a wide-spread perception that nothing happens above 20kHz, you may not be able to hear a pure tone above 20kHz, but you can recognize the artifacts of noisy switchers, etc ... the THD+N measured on the AA5001 is 0.633% with no low pass filters switched in.
In the closed system of the QA400 it doesn't see the out of band stuff. However it does see the ground currents etc. The reason for the interface I'm working on is to deal with the noise currents. I went over some of this at the beginning of the thread.
I am still working on gen 2 that addresses some dynamic range issues to better match to how this is used.
Meanwhile, try a cliplead from the PC to the chassis of the box you are testing. Give the ground noise currents a separate path.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
I am still working on gen 2 that addresses some dynamic range issues to better match to how this is used.
Meanwhile, try a cliplead from the PC to the chassis of the box you are testing. Give the ground noise currents a separate path.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk