|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
Could some one please explain to me why the focal length before the condensor is reduced and not after the collector in a unsplit fresnel configuration. You would think it should affect either side of the fresnel resulting in a shorter focal length on the collector side as well. How could Focal length after the collector fresnel be shortened apart from going for a shorter focal length Collector fresnel or by folding the optic patch?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ?
|
i don´t know what are you asking at all
when you have rear fresnell and front frsenell, you can consider like if you had 1 fresnell. The focal of this new fresnell deppends on the other two focals. lets say you have 220/330 dual fresnell from a ÖHP, then it is lke if you had 132mm focal 1 frresnell. you can place a bulb at diferent distances from this new equivalent lens, each distance will focus the light at each associated distance at other side. allways is the same formulae; 1/F=1/d1 + 1/d2 d1, d2 distances and F the focal of the lens. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
So does that mean this theory is incorrect??
http://s6.invisionfree.com/diyprojec...p?showtopic=35 There it says that only before the unsplit fresnel lens it will shorten but not after the unsplit fresnel lens. Any comments??? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ?
|
sorry link does not work
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06277 seconds (74.67% PHP - 25.33% MySQL) with 10 queries |