are these good specs

part2wanksta · 16th March 2005, 01:33 PM

Amorphous Active Matrix TFT/LCD Screen
(16:9) Ratio Wide Screen Monitor
5 Screen Modes (Full, Stretch, Cinema, Wide, Zoom)
Injection Molded Case
OSD On Screen Display (NTSC & PAL)
Selectable Single Video Input
Remote Control Panel
Brightness: 450NIT
Resolution: 1200 x 234
Dimensions: 6 x 5 x .75”

remember i have a ps1 screen. this screen would cost me 60 dollars. is it worth it.

i need something that wont show much screendoor effect

Inkog · 16th March 2005, 01:46 PM

1200x234 is not 16:9 or even close. 16:9 would be 1200x675 is this info a typo?

*edit*

"Dimensions: 6 x 5 x .75”

These are not dimentions of a wide screen aspect ratio either

part2wanksta · 16th March 2005, 02:20 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...758412170&rd=1

thats what it says

Inkog · 16th March 2005, 03:20 PM

Those pics are not of a 16:9 monitor. I checked poweracoustik's website and could not find that exact model by picture. It looks to be a discontinued headrest model. Going by their current stock, I would guess it is no more than 960x234, if that.

I may be wrong. I'm just trying to make sure your getting what you pay for. Still, it may be worth the 100 bucks...

justme · 16th March 2005, 03:51 PM

If you divide the first number by three the resolution would be 400x234 which is close to 16:9. They could be going by the manufacturers' description and they like to use dots/subpixels interchangibly with pixels.

16th March 2005, 01:33 PM	#1
part2wanksta diyAudio Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: new mexico	are these good specs Amorphous Active Matrix TFT/LCD Screen (16:9) Ratio Wide Screen Monitor 5 Screen Modes (Full, Stretch, Cinema, Wide, Zoom) Injection Molded Case OSD On Screen Display (NTSC & PAL) Selectable Single Video Input Remote Control Panel Brightness: 450NIT Resolution: 1200 x 234 Dimensions: 6 x 5 x .75” remember i have a ps1 screen. this screen would cost me 60 dollars. is it worth it. i need something that wont show much screendoor effect

16th March 2005, 03:51 PM	#5
justme diyAudio Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: inconsistant	actual resolution? If you divide the first number by three the resolution would be 400x234 which is close to 16:9. They could be going by the manufacturers' description and they like to use dots/subpixels interchangibly with pixels.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Good general purpose opamp with good DC specs?	speakerguy79	Parts	1	17th November 2006 05:10 AM
Good switch for Stepped attentuater, Good cheap RCA jacks	pjpoes	Parts	20	10th March 2005 09:47 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


<a rel='nofollow' href='http://www.diyaudio.com/openx/www/delivery/ck.php?n=aa5cb2e9&cb=8067' target='_blank'><img src='http://www.diyaudio.com/openx/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=3&cb=8067&n=aa5cb2e9' border='0' alt='' /></a>	We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits! Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing

16th March 2005, 01:46 PM	#2
Inkog diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Louisville, KY	1200x234 is not 16:9 or even close. 16:9 would be 1200x675 is this info a typo? edit "Dimensions: 6 x 5 x .75” These are not dimentions of a wide screen aspect ratio either

16th March 2005, 02:20 PM	#3
part2wanksta diyAudio Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: new mexico	http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...758412170&rd=1 thats what it says

16th March 2005, 03:20 PM	#4
Inkog diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Louisville, KY	Those pics are not of a 16:9 monitor. I checked poweracoustik's website and could not find that exact model by picture. It looks to be a discontinued headrest model. Going by their current stock, I would guess it is no more than 960x234, if that. I may be wrong. I'm just trying to make sure your getting what you pay for. Still, it may be worth the 100 bucks...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)