|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
|
Low-cost DVD players can be used as transports for PCM CD playback. I wonder what make these modern players deliver good performance, i.e. very low jitter as expensive transports in the old days. Effects of new circuitry, pick-up laser, memory buffer, etc ?
Tweaks for Geeks, IEEE Spectrum.
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Africa, Jhb
|
Wishful thinking?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
People seem to not understand how CDs and jitter work.
The CD format is designed to take the CDM out of the equation. The DVD player in question will make a first-rate transport, as good as any other. It will not produce more or less jitter than any other transport. In fact, the last sentence is stupid. There's no more relation between the transport and jitter than there is between ice cream sales and shark attacks. The D/A section is more complicated. There are so many factors starting with the PSU. |
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
In his article, Robert McNeice mentions that jitter may be reduced by mechanically damping the clock crystal. This seems a little contradictory to what you write about jitter and the transport. I myself have never experienced any jitter improvements by damping the crystal, but are there any people out there who have measured the difference? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Premise: Ice cream sales go up in the summer.
Premise: The number of shark attacks goes up in the summer. Conclusion: Ice cream causes shark attacks. That's a classic example of a logical fallacy. "Equipped with ESOTERIC's most advanced VRDS-NEO mechanism evolved from the critically acclaimed X-01. Rigidity and vibration-resistant ability is improved by the use of a half inch-thick solid shaved-aluminum mechanism base plate," it says on the Teac web site. And it goes on to tell about all the other marvelous things the P-01 transport does. And this tweak guy dampens a crystal. The Teac site doesn't say what the consequences are if you don't reduce vibration, but the idea is that you are to believe they are bad. The tweak guy is more upfront. Both are equally wrong. They are simply reversing the ice cream/shark attack reasoning. They tell you that they have banned ice cream on their beaches so now you can go in the water without having to worry about sharks. Aren't you happy you are on their beaches and not on one where the sharks are? The information on a CD (and SACD and DVD-A) is interleaved. Thus, having a stable and steady motor is meaningless. A CD is nothing like vinyl. A CD is closer to a hard drive. A CD is read one rotation at the time. After each rotation the data is sent to the first-in, first-out devised, buffered and sent to the I2S bus or whatever. Vibrations are clearly not good if they cause the CDM to skip. But no CDM vibrates, or shakes, that much. Meridian makes perhaps the lowest jitter CD player on the planet. Meridian uses CD ROM drives. You can believe they use special "audio-grade" CD ROM drives if you want. But you will be believing wrong. The SPDIF, on the other hand, is a source for jitter. That should mean that the easiest way to avoid jitter is to not use separate transport and DAC. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you Google for reviews on this particular player you'll find it has been known to have reliability problems. Not sure this is off topic or what. I can appreciate the one-board approach however and is probably what I'd look for in my next cd/dvd purchase.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
|
Thanks for some explanation, phn.
Is the proof of no "transport effect" is the popularity of low-cost upscale dvd player ? Some of them offers the best video performance, like the OPPO DV-971 or the others. No low-cost drive runs in real-time today ? All data are buffered first, like in the Merdian player ? S/PDIF signalling is very well handled by decent commercial chips. However, we still hear difference when we use different transports to drive a decent DAC. What should be the critical points ? So, what else are left ? The PSU, the components quality ? |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Dear god i loved that post ![]() as for what causes jitter: cheap solutions
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens+Addis Ababa
|
PHN,
So you believe that vibration isolation in cd transports has absolutely no audible effect unless they are vibrating so much they are skipping?
__________________
``The author always assumes that when power is applied , the amplifier will explode or ,at the very least, catch fire.´´ Morgan Jones, Building Valve Amplifiers. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 'Best' cost/simplicity/performance 10 W Single Ended Class A | npr | Pass Labs | 2 | 25th September 2006 09:48 AM |
| Three things you can do to make CD players sound better | Jocko Homo | Digital Source | 227 | 26th February 2006 10:27 AM |
| Low cost CD/DVD players (under US$200) with HDCD | soongsc | Digital Source | 3 | 9th June 2005 07:13 AM |
| Looking for some solutions to low cost-high performance Subs | Emission | Subwoofers | 39 | 18th February 2005 03:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |