|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
A while ago I stumbled across a series of documents posted on the Audio Crafters Guild website describing a re-clocking circuit the Digital Output One and it's implementation in the VRDS 7 and T-1.
http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/DOO1.1b.pdf http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/doo11rev1.pdf http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf I've been interested in building one, but as time passes that becomes a more and more difficult task. The key chip MC10216P for instance is now EOL'd but can probably still be be sourced. I'm wondering if it is still worth the effort of sourcing the "hard to find" parts or has the design been rendered sufficiently obsolete by more recent developments not to be worth the effort? cheers Paul |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
There are more clocks, commercially available, some of them even include SPDIF reclocking. best |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
Hi Guido,
thanks for the response. I'm aware of the plethora of commercial clocking kits, and some - like the tentlabs XO clocks - do look very tasty indeed. I'm attracted to the ground-up diy aspect of the DOO, which does have a reclocked S/PDIF, and I think I can source the majority of parts still. Some minor hurdles are a MOQ of 3 pieces imposed by Scientific Conversion on the S/PDIF-interface transformer, and difficulty in sourcing some of the improved components, notably the CY74FCT2244CTPC (or substitute) mentioned in the Rev1 document. Out of interest, what level of improvement would an xo3 offer over the DOO in terms of jitter reduction? cheers Paul |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Switzerland (Bern)
|
Guido,
what I am missing regarding XO3: - how do you deal with sync of the SPDIF signal and the masterclock (see http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf where you see a clear description how the sync must be checked and applied). May this depends also on the just master clock freq. while higher clock rates would give you a smaler latch window. - the master clock signal output level (spec's) given to the related CD drive circuit. HpW
__________________
www.hpw-works.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Hi XO3 feeds the CDplayer and the SPDIF generated is in synch with the players master clock. The timing on the XO3 very seldomly goes wrong (I have solved such problems with 3 customers only) The XO boards put out 5V, HCMOS compaible signals. best |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Switzerland (Bern)
|
>> The timing on the XO3 very seldomly goes wrong (I have solved such problems with 3 customers only)
Really no checks! See in the teac-doo.pdf file how close the edges are! > The XO boards put out 5V, HCMOS compaible signals. Hopfully there will be no signal overshout's given to the sensitive xtal input caused by the masterclock line! All for this, a high speed scope and a low cap. prope should be used what is usal not avaiable... Cheers HpW
__________________
www.hpw-works.com |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
like I said, no significant timing problems for my boards. Overshoot isn't a real problem either, I use series termination, and th bit of overshoot (say 10%) won't excite the internal clamping diodes (as these are on silicon, they start conducting at say 1V) 98% of my customers have no scope at all but working applications....... best Guido |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
Ok, seeing I got no negative (or positive for that matter) feedback on the DOO, I'm going to push on and build one.
I've managed to source a few MC10216P and 74FCT244P - the 74FCT2244 seems to be unobtanium in thru hole. MOQ's on the amidon multibeads and scientific conversions parts mean that I'll end up with "rare" parts for 3or4 x DOO. Over the break I'm going to take a look at re-doing the layout of the boards to incorporate changes described in the DOO11rev1 document, and will get a few boards done early next year. If anyone is interested in a set of "rare" parts and a board let me know cheers Paul |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
best |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
Hi Guido,
I haven't seen any figures either, so I guess it's a case of building and listening/find someone with the gear to measure. I'll make allowance on the pcb to replace the ECL oscillator with an XO module. I seem to be accumulating enough parts to build a couple of these modules, so it could be an interesting exercise. cheers Paul |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TEAC VRDS-10 vs VRDS 25X | Pani | Digital Source | 12 | 3rd April 2011 04:03 AM |
| About a reclock for a dac | gaetan8888 | Digital Source | 0 | 28th October 2008 05:49 AM |
| Is This Amplifier Worthwhile Building | Powertimes_2 | Solid State | 19 | 15th January 2008 02:28 PM |
| VRDS 25 and VRDS 25X: how to tell the difference? | dubkarma | Digital Source | 1 | 20th August 2006 03:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12417 seconds (82.15% PHP - 17.85% MySQL) with 11 queries |