Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th December 2006, 12:21 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
spzzzzkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Default ACG VRDS T-1 reclock - is it still worthwhile?

A while ago I stumbled across a series of documents posted on the Audio Crafters Guild website describing a re-clocking circuit the Digital Output One and it's implementation in the VRDS 7 and T-1.

http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/DOO1.1b.pdf
http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/doo11rev1.pdf
http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf

I've been interested in building one, but as time passes that becomes a more and more difficult task. The key chip MC10216P for instance is now EOL'd but can probably still be be sourced.

I'm wondering if it is still worth the effort of sourcing the "hard to find" parts or has the design been rendered sufficiently obsolete by more recent developments not to be worth the effort?

cheers
Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2006, 05:39 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
Default Re: ACG VRDS T-1 reclock - is it still worthwhile?

Quote:
Originally posted by spzzzzkt
A while ago I stumbled across a series of documents posted on the Audio Crafters Guild website describing a re-clocking circuit the Digital Output One and it's implementation in the VRDS 7 and T-1.

http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/DOO1.1b.pdf
http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/doo11rev1.pdf
http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf

I've been interested in building one, but as time passes that becomes a more and more difficult task. The key chip MC10216P for instance is now EOL'd but can probably still be be sourced.

I'm wondering if it is still worth the effort of sourcing the "hard to find" parts or has the design been rendered sufficiently obsolete by more recent developments not to be worth the effort?

cheers
Paul
Hi Paul

There are more clocks, commercially available, some of them even include SPDIF reclocking.

best
__________________
Guido Tent
www.Tentlabs.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 04:58 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
spzzzzkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Hi Guido,

thanks for the response. I'm aware of the plethora of commercial clocking kits, and some - like the tentlabs XO clocks - do look very tasty indeed.

I'm attracted to the ground-up diy aspect of the DOO, which does have a reclocked S/PDIF, and I think I can source the majority of parts still.

Some minor hurdles are a MOQ of 3 pieces imposed by Scientific Conversion on the S/PDIF-interface transformer, and difficulty in sourcing some of the improved components, notably the CY74FCT2244CTPC (or substitute) mentioned in the Rev1 document.

Out of interest, what level of improvement would an xo3 offer over the DOO in terms of jitter reduction?


cheers
Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 08:03 AM   #4
HpW is offline HpW  Switzerland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Switzerland (Bern)
Default XO3 setups follow questions

Guido,

what I am missing regarding XO3:

- how do you deal with sync of the SPDIF signal and the masterclock (see http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf where you see a clear description how the sync must be checked and applied). May this depends also on the just master clock freq. while higher clock rates would give you a smaler latch window.

- the master clock signal output level (spec's) given to the related CD drive circuit.

HpW
__________________
www.hpw-works.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 09:47 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
Default Re: XO3 setups follow questions

Quote:
Originally posted by HpW
Guido,

what I am missing regarding XO3:

- how do you deal with sync of the SPDIF signal and the masterclock (see http://www.audiocraftersguild.com/AandE/teac-doo.pdf where you see a clear description how the sync must be checked and applied). May this depends also on the just master clock freq. while higher clock rates would give you a smaler latch window.

- the master clock signal output level (spec's) given to the related CD drive circuit.

HpW

Hi

XO3 feeds the CDplayer and the SPDIF generated is in synch with the players master clock. The timing on the XO3 very seldomly goes wrong (I have solved such problems with 3 customers only)

The XO boards put out 5V, HCMOS compaible signals.

best
__________________
Guido Tent
www.Tentlabs.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 04:51 PM   #6
HpW is offline HpW  Switzerland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Switzerland (Bern)
Default really no checks?

>> The timing on the XO3 very seldomly goes wrong (I have solved such problems with 3 customers only)

Really no checks!

See in the teac-doo.pdf file how close the edges are!


> The XO boards put out 5V, HCMOS compaible signals.

Hopfully there will be no signal overshout's given to the sensitive xtal input caused by the masterclock line!


All for this, a high speed scope and a low cap. prope should be used what is usal not avaiable...


Cheers

HpW
__________________
www.hpw-works.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 05:09 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
Default Re: really no checks?

Quote:
Originally posted by HpW
>> The timing on the XO3 very seldomly goes wrong (I have solved such problems with 3 customers only)

Really no checks!

See in the teac-doo.pdf file how close the edges are!


> The XO boards put out 5V, HCMOS compaible signals.

Hopfully there will be no signal overshout's given to the sensitive xtal input caused by the masterclock line!


All for this, a high speed scope and a low cap. prope should be used what is usal not avaiable...


Cheers

HpW

like I said, no significant timing problems for my boards. Overshoot isn't a real problem either, I use series termination, and th bit of overshoot (say 10%) won't excite the internal clamping diodes (as these are on silicon, they start conducting at say 1V)

98% of my customers have no scope at all but working applications.......

best

Guido
__________________
Guido Tent
www.Tentlabs.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2006, 09:21 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
spzzzzkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Ok, seeing I got no negative (or positive for that matter) feedback on the DOO, I'm going to push on and build one.

I've managed to source a few MC10216P and 74FCT244P - the 74FCT2244 seems to be unobtanium in thru hole. MOQ's on the amidon multibeads and scientific conversions parts mean that I'll end up with "rare" parts for 3or4 x DOO.

Over the break I'm going to take a look at re-doing the layout of the boards to incorporate changes described in the DOO11rev1 document, and will get a few boards done early next year.

If anyone is interested in a set of "rare" parts and a board let me know

cheers
Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2006, 07:41 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
Quote:
Originally posted by spzzzzkt
Hi Guido,

Out of interest, what level of improvement would an xo3 offer over the DOO in terms of jitter reduction?


cheers
Paul
I have no clue as there are no measured results on the DOO

best
__________________
Guido Tent
www.Tentlabs.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2006, 09:08 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
spzzzzkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Hi Guido,

I haven't seen any figures either, so I guess it's a case of building and listening/find someone with the gear to measure. I'll make allowance on the pcb to replace the ECL oscillator with an XO module. I seem to be accumulating enough parts to build a couple of these modules, so it could be an interesting exercise.

cheers
Paul
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TEAC VRDS-10 vs VRDS 25X Pani Digital Source 12 3rd April 2011 04:03 AM
About a reclock for a dac gaetan8888 Digital Source 0 28th October 2008 05:49 AM
Is This Amplifier Worthwhile Building Powertimes_2 Solid State 19 15th January 2008 02:28 PM
VRDS 25 and VRDS 25X: how to tell the difference? dubkarma Digital Source 1 20th August 2006 03:44 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Page generated in 0.12417 seconds (82.15% PHP - 17.85% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio