|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello
I suspect the signal from my cs8416 is filled with jitter on the "recovered master clock" and perhaps the bit clock is not any better. I was thinking that I could insert a pll with slow tuning before the dac. I guess initial tuning should be rather easy when I already have a reference clock and with slow tuning I mean the feedback should be with a relatively large time-constant. With the new clock I can reclock data signal in a way that I don't throw away any samples. Should I ignore the recovered master clock and derive a 4*(bit clock) from the bit clock to get a 256*fs signal for my dac chip? Does higher system clocks sound better on TI dac chips? What do you think - is this even possible? - Christian |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
|
It is indeed possible, and IMO the best implementation of this is here:
http://members.chello.nl/~m.heijlige...%20a%20DAC.htm OJG |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
Yes it only supports 44.1, maybe 88.2 but not 48 or 96. The designer, Guido Tent, is a member of this forum and can surely answer any questions better than I. OJG |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think I'll prefer if the frequency could be tuned to both cd and dvd.
I have tried to simulate different oscillators, but i don't seem to be able to find discrete transistors with enough gain at high frequencies to oscillate in the range 10-50MHz with nice squares. Any suggestions to a VCO I could use? Will most dac chips enjoy sines as clock signals? It would be really cool to make the whole PLL circuit with discrete smd's, but I'm afraid it'll act as a transmitter and I might disturb the military frequencies... No comments about what signal to use for PLL? Bit-clock or recovered master clock from spdif receiver? I'm thinking that the bit-clock would be the better option. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
And installing a pre-assembled module is still diy.............just to a lesser extent......like using an IC instead of discrete components.
__________________
Regards Fin |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| generate jitter test signal and measurign jitter using AP2? | BJAMR | Digital Source | 11 | 1st November 2010 02:07 PM |
| jitter and noise performance of 74xx AC and VHC series? | patwen | Digital Source | 2 | 22nd November 2004 12:31 PM |
| Data Jitter Versus Electrical Jitter? | 300_baud | Digital Source | 8 | 16th July 2004 07:59 PM |
| Damping transports to kill vibrations sounds and improve signal (jitter)? | halcyon | Digital Source | 6 | 24th March 2004 08:16 PM |
| Will AD1896 improve jitter rejection? | yejun | Digital Source | 4 | 2nd July 2003 09:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09917 seconds (74.68% PHP - 25.32% MySQL) with 10 queries |