Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd November 2006, 11:25 PM   #1
SunRa is offline SunRa  Romania
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Romania
Default why cs8412?

I'm quite new in digital, did some readings but that's all... so my question could be a little dumb. I am wondering why so many use the CS8412/14/16 as a reciever... only because it is available? There's nothing beter than this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2006, 01:53 AM   #2
gmarsh is offline gmarsh  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
gmarsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
The CS841x series have been around for a while, they're available at all sorts of distributors, and they're "established" parts. Not the best, but almost everything wrong with them has a workaround and if you follow the datasheet to the letter, they'll work well.

AKM makes similar bits, but I can't find their stuff anywhere - zero hits on findchips.com for anything AKM.

TI made the DIR series for a while, which were tempermental and then got discontinued. They make new DIT/SRC chips right now which are new and "unknown" at this point; I hope they're OK considering I just designed them into a board.

And that's almost all I can think of... Analog Devices makes a receiver except it's ancient.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2006, 06:36 AM   #3
SunRa is offline SunRa  Romania
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Romania
Thanks gmarsh,

Well, I was expecting this kind of answer. Actually my concern was regarding the fact we are using dacs capable of 24/192, with great snr (like ad1955, WM8740), 192Khz sample rate converters like AD1895 or AD1896... and the CS8414 recievers which have some weaker specifications (up to 92Khz, for example), which look to me like a bottleneck.. (although cs8416 is up to 192Khz if I'm not mistaking).
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone have CS8412? bezobraznia Digital Source 16 15th December 2005 09:08 AM
Cs8412 burbeck Parts 1 25th February 2005 10:06 AM
Fs: Cs8412 mdlover Swap Meet 0 26th January 2005 04:10 PM
Help with Cs8412 NickC Digital Source 0 6th January 2004 11:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Page generated in 0.07263 seconds (72.58% PHP - 27.42% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio