Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd October 2006, 06:17 PM   #1
mrdon is offline mrdon  United States
diyAudio Member
 
mrdon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hawthorne, NJ
Default Wall-wart to Toroid, worth the $$$?

I've been attempting to improve my $40 Entech Number Cruncher 203.2. According to my internet research, all the regular tweaking tricks have been attempted in modding this DAC but with very little success. The only two that seem to work best are changing the opa2134 opamp to AD8066 and implementing the "wildmonkeysects CS8412 loop filter" found over at AA.

One other area which I would like to explore is the power supply. I am thinking about upgrading the 16VAC wall-wart transformer to a 16VAC toroidal power supply which would be placed in an ABS enclosure with an IEC input connector, etc...

Do you think moving from a wall-wart to toroidal power supply would be worth the extra investment of time, talent, and treasure? In your experience, would more audio juice be squeezed into my ears?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2006, 07:03 PM   #2
tubenut is offline tubenut  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
tubenut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Africa, Jhb
In my experience with DACs and Phono Stages.......YES!!! Use a toroid about 5x or more the VA of the wall wart.
__________________
Guillaume
Croak Audio Exploration
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2006, 07:23 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
I'm actually in the middle of re-housing three Entech's into a single enclosure and have built some new supplies for them.

I'm not a big believer of using a super large toroid for a DAC that only ever uses 6 watts of power max.

I figured the better thing to do was go with full-wave rectification using dual secondaries and two rectifiers. The transformers I'm using are 1.6VA, yes I said ONE-POINT-SIX VA, and thats plenty of power for this DAC. No crazy overkill there.

Here's a pic of one of the new supplies connected to the board when I was testing it.

http://i12.tinypic.com/2ui9nit.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 10:17 AM   #4
peufeu is offline peufeu  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lyon, France
With 1.6 watts, who needs transformers, you could even power it from solar cells for a nice clean power without mains hash !

Would make a nice complement to a planet-warming 100W class A monster...
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 11:23 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Quote:
Originally posted by peufeu
With 1.6 watts, who needs transformers, you could even power it from solar cells for a nice clean power without mains hash !

Would make a nice complement to a planet-warming 100W class A monster...
Not sure if thats sarcasm or not.

The transformer is marked 18VAC @ 1.6VA x 2, but in use total power consumption is about 5-6w.

The DAC doesn't lack any bass or detail using this "flea powered" supply, so I don't understand why one would want to use an overrated toroid unless they just happen to have piles of them laying around.

Plenty of people build headphone/preamps that run off 9v batteries. Why are those considered OK to use such a small supply, but something like this supposedly needs some monsterous bundle of copper.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 01:11 PM   #6
tubenut is offline tubenut  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
tubenut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Africa, Jhb
I believe the audible improvement is not actually as a result of available current from the bigger transformer but rather the lowering of the PSU impedance due to the thicker secondary windings of the larger transformer.

In the case of power amps it has to do with "stiffnes" of the supply and the lower impedance imo.
__________________
Guillaume
Croak Audio Exploration
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 01:21 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
I can understand that point in regards to a power amp, but it doesn't make much sense to me when dealing with such a small load.

Wouldn't the net PSU impedance be effected by the filtering caps? If large enough low impedance caps are used wouldn't that help offset a trafo with a slightly higher impedance?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 06:28 PM   #8
tubenut is offline tubenut  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
tubenut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Africa, Jhb
Lots of stuff in this hobby makes little sense..... But my audio senses tel me big txf, even on a small load is a good thing.
__________________
Guillaume
Croak Audio Exploration
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2006, 06:43 PM   #9
poynton is offline poynton  United Kingdom
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
 
poynton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A life on the ocean waves when I'm not at home in N. Wales (but I'm not Welsh so no sheep jokes!)
Quote:
Originally posted by theAnonymous1
I can understand that point in regards to a power amp, but it doesn't make much sense to me when dealing with such a small load.

Wouldn't the net PSU impedance be effected by the filtering caps? If large enough low impedance caps are used wouldn't that help offset a trafo with a slightly higher impedance?

Hi.

The makers of a well known clock would disagree about the importance of the PSU. The 'Never-Connected' type power supply isolates the transformer from the load.

Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg flying_cap_psu_sch.jpg (85.8 KB, 121 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 07:14 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
weinstro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Default Re: Wall-wart to Toroid, worth the $$$?

Quote:
Originally posted by mrdon
Do you think moving from a wall-wart to toroidal power supply would be worth the extra investment of time, talent, and treasure? In your experience, would more audio juice be squeezed into my ears?
I did this for a Musical Fidelty X-CAN, which requires 12 Vac input for power. My situation is that I had purchased the unit in Spain, then discovered that a new walwart transformer would be required for operation in the USA. The cost of the new walwart was comparable to what I could put together on my own.

So, I went to Parts Express, and ordered a transformer (36VA, IIRC), parts for a dc blocker, fuse holder, power cords and cast aluminum enclosure. Works great.

One thing to watch on the transformer is to make sure that the regulation is adequate for the load you're going to use. Also, torroids can saturate easily if there is any dc on your ac power, such as from a light dimmer, so you might want to consider making a dc blocking circuit.

Regards,

Rob
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wall wart and basswood BluesMagoos Analogue Source 6 9th September 2007 09:54 AM
Sonic T wall wart Smokehouse Bob Class D 7 6th November 2006 01:47 AM
Wall Wart for testing bal704 Chip Amps 6 23rd October 2006 01:47 AM
best wall wart for t-amp, where? gychang Class D 3 2nd October 2006 12:06 PM
2 Wall Wart PS Question Sherman Chip Amps 13 22nd February 2005 09:25 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Page generated in 0.11343 seconds (80.08% PHP - 19.92% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio