With all the benifits of slaving your transport to your DAC, I thought of a cheap way to do this. Since the MCLK of the CS1814 isn't used on the DAC-AH could you use this output to replace the oscillator of a 11.28GHZ CD Player.
Less Loss Audio claims huge jitter reduction by running your treansport as a slave. This would cost basically nothing for those of us with the DAC-AH or other non-reclocking CS1814 NOS DAC's.
Less Loss Audio claims huge jitter reduction by running your treansport as a slave. This would cost basically nothing for those of us with the DAC-AH or other non-reclocking CS1814 NOS DAC's.
Chicken Egg Egg Chicken
No oscillator No sound. Unless you are after the Golden Sound of Silence
Ulas said:Who cares about oscillators; the prime impetus of this forum is the elimination of jitter. That's why regal's idea is so ingenious. No oscillator = no jitter. Brilliant!
No oscillator No sound. Unless you are after the Golden Sound of Silence
Re: Chicken Egg Egg Chicken
And that's when the DAC-AH is at it's best. That DAC sounds worse than any AC97 CODEC I've ever heard.
rfbrw said:No oscillator No sound. Unless you are after the Golden Sound of Silence
And that's when the DAC-AH is at it's best. That DAC sounds worse than any AC97 CODEC I've ever heard.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- Slave Transport to DAC-AH