|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
Hey, all. I've been working the last several days on designing a PCB for my DAC. For a look at the schematic (the PCB strays somewhat), see:
http://www2.kumc.edu/students/ezamir.../schematic.png As for the PCB, it is basically the fairly common (it seems to me) topology of CS8416->AD1896->PCM1794(8) and then AD8610 for I/V conversion. It uses 3 LM317's (3.3, 5.0, 12) and 1 LM337 (-12), and will be input a +/- 15V line from a dual supply DIY PSU I made recently. See my web page for more info. Thanks, in advance, for any advice/suggestions yada, yada. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton
|
Hi.
The filter components for the PLL on the CS8416 should be mounted much closer to pin 8. Refer to the data sheet (page 59) for details. http://www.cirrus.com/en/pubs/proDat.../CS8416_F1.pdf The pll filter is important on achiving good jitter rejection. HTH Chris |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
Thanks, Chris.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
I've updated the PCB. I guess it must be perfect, since there were no other comments besides Chris. Here's a link to the PCB showing all layers:
http://www.cellandtissue.com/DIY/DAC...cb_all_v01.png For more pics showing the layers separately, please see my www (middle of the page). I hope it is clear my comment about the PCB being perfect is pure (wishful?) sarcasm. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
|
The combination of fine-pitch SMD and no solder mask makes ExpressPCB Miniboards very difficult to work with. I suggest you increase the pad clearance (in board properties) to at least .020" and define all pads that connect to a filled plane as thermal pads.
I prefer the ground plane on the component side, wide power busses, and 0603 SMD passives on either side to reduce trace length. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
Quote:
Thanks. Do most people agree that ground plane should be on the component side? If so, does that mean the bottom should be used for power rails/planes? That's a major change, so it would be great if other people could chime in their opinion on this. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
|
EZ, don’t change your layout on my account. I was just stating MY preferences. Understand, unless you are experienced soldering SMD, the ground plane on the component side will make assembly much more difficult. It will also necessitate more vias, which may bump against the 250-hole per board limit.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
Thanks. I have a quick question. What is the benefit of specifying the thermal pad connections?
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Also, as you have things now, I would work very hard to get those big cuts out of the groundplane. It may take moving some stuff around, but they are a bad thing. Also, I like to include ferrites/inductors (0805 or 1206) on the power rails close to the power pins. Not only does this clean up the power, but it will give you some little places to cleverly route some traces. And why do G1/G2/RG/LG, etc. not just connect to the ground plane? Why the little extra? Oh, and add a couple of vias to the ground and power rails to allow easier metering. I would also space the spdif and V and output connections about 5mm (or 5.08mm) apart so that you can use a terminal block. You'll thank me later. Last, I know you probably think space is too tight, but I would add an input transformer and perhaps a little buffer. It will do more to improve the sound that just about anything else. There is a schematic floating around that uses the 74HC04D that is attributed to a now banned member. The same schematic can also be found in the Philips datasheet for that part. And, for what it's worth, I find the boards without soldermask a little easier to solder SMD onto. Not sure why, exactly, but things always seem to come out cleaner for me. -d |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
|
D, thanks for your advice. Let me take these points one by one.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First attempt | j beede | Planars & Exotics | 21 | 27th December 2008 04:31 AM |
| First DIY amp attempt! | RTF671 | Instruments and Amps | 8 | 8th June 2008 02:22 AM |
| First attempt...Elf 1.5 | sheik | Multi-Way | 0 | 1st August 2003 02:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10886 seconds (83.91% PHP - 16.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |