Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st June 2006, 10:21 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Default Hybrid DAC with calibration

My new project:

A 16 bit DAC that uses one DAC chip per bit = 16 DACs per channel.
Chips are parallel data input / current output DACs BB PCM54.

They work as precision switchable current sources.
All 16 currents are summed up on the virtual ground of the I/V stage.

Every bit's output current is very fine adjustable, within the magnitude of 2 LSBs, having a low-ohm pot + resistor network between Iout and virtual ground.

Calibration will be done watching harmonics fade away on the analyzer.

If it works ok, there are options to calibrate without pots and resistors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2006, 10:45 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin!
Send a message via AIM to Rescue Toaster
Shouldn't the error of even the MSB be less than one LSB? At least on a decent chip?

And isn't it likely you'll introduce glitch noise?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006, 03:01 AM   #3
BrianL is offline BrianL  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Do you think that a bunch of pots and resistors that you trim (with what instrumentation?) will be better than the precision trimming of an individual DAC? I think not.

Surely it would be easier to buy and 18 or 20 or 22 or 24 bit DAC that has linearity to better than 16 bits.

Read data sheets carefully
__________________
bel
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006, 11:07 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally posted by Rescue Toaster
Shouldn't the error of even the MSB be less than one LSB? At least on a decent chip?
Tolerance should be much tighter, about 1/50 LSB but it isn't.
That is why a few chips have adjustment for MSB + next 3 bits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006, 11:15 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally posted by BrianL
Do you think that a bunch of pots and resistors that you trim (with what instrumentation?) will be better than the precision trimming of an individual DAC? I think not.

Surely it would be easier to buy and 18 or 20 or 22 or 24 bit DAC that has linearity to better than 16 bits.

Read data sheets carefully

The precision trimming of an individual DAC is not that precise, thats why there are selection grades.
It is a simple game, all you must do is make disappear those vertical lines on the screen.

Nobody should believe that any 20bit chip is better compared to a 16 bit one.

The most expensive 18bit BB instrumentation DAC has 16bit accuracy from precise factory trim and needs user calibration with 4 pots to perhaps reach 18 bit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 11:25 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
I have built one channel and it works so far.
So far means the sound is distorted, harmonics -36dB @ FS which is about 2% ??? distortion.
What I had overlooked is that audio DACs have poor gain error of 2%
Now I will put in bigger pots and see how far the DAC can be calibrated.
Later the bit errors can be compensated to one or two LSBs by choosing different codes and the fine adjustment again with the pots.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 11:59 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally posted by Bernhard
I have built one channel and it works so far.
So far means the sound is distorted, harmonics -36dB @ FS which is about 2% ??? distortion.
What I had overlooked is that audio DACs have poor gain error of 2%
Now I will put in bigger pots and see how far the DAC can be calibrated.
Later the bit errors can be compensated to one or two LSBs by choosing different codes and the fine adjustment again with the pots.

Bernhard,

Two comments:

- the poor gain error should not cause this 2% distortion. This is a linear distortion meaning that your output level in RMS terms would be off from the design value, but should be undistorted.

- even if the gain error would cause distortion, the fact that you have 16 DACs in parallel would average it out and the result should be much better.

I think there is another mechanism causing the high distortion. How sure are you that the input signal is distortion free?

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 12:32 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 6
Too late for edit: You may check the input sigbnal and general setup by temporarily disconnecting 15 of the 16 DACs. How does that look?

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 01:47 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Hi Jan

each DAC is only switching from BPZ to the corresponding fixed bit current.
One DAC per bit.
I use the DACs as precision current sources with integrated switch.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 04:40 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally posted by Bernhard
Hi Jan

each DAC is only switching from BPZ to the corresponding fixed bit current.
One DAC per bit.
I use the DACs as precision current sources with integrated switch.

I still don't get the whole picture. What's BPZ?

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARTA calibration help augerpro Multi-Way 5 14th June 2009 11:11 PM
A Mic Calibration How-To cuibono Multi-Way 3 11th June 2009 12:10 PM
Amp Calibration in SW arc2v Multi-Way 7 29th February 2008 07:38 PM
AudioTester 2.2 Calibration Tyimo Multi-Way 0 29th March 2007 06:34 PM
My wacky idea for a hybrid horn loaded woofer/planar widerange hybrid loudspeaker. Spasticteapot Multi-Way 0 30th November 2006 05:16 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Page generated in 0.17688 seconds (61.80% PHP - 38.20% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio