|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
but to get 132dB the "1792" has to deliver 9Vrms..... That's a lot
Is this the future?... higher signal level in prestage and less gain in the output stage? Just asking! Sonny |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
The future will tell....as always! It's like MHz and GHz in clock frequency at computers. What is the functional speed difference in text editing between Word 2 and the latest version?
Anyboby who has a datasheet? It seem to be a top secret right now.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Weird. I wonder what kind of power rails this DAC wants. +/-5V or +10V or something else?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
more like +/-15V i would think...say goodbye to +/-5V mixed signal devices!!!!
Sound's like sweet talk to me!!!! .... you can't get pass the noisefloor.... So you have to raise the level! Sonny |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
isn't that right Nelson?!?? why should you then be able to get a dynamic range of 150dB...
Sonny |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
1 µV noise, 4 Vrms audio = 132 dB Not so extreme when you think about it.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm all for higher voltage rails. If we get 9VRMS voltage outputs from the DAC, we have a much easier job of post-DAC filtering and line driving.
If it's 15V rails we can also use some canned superregulator circuits. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Europe, Slovenia
|
Interesting, but isnt this advanced segment dac like 1738, isnt sign magnitude better?
Did they discontinued to use sign magnitude technology? Why? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
|
My sense is that this DAC is just an updated PCM 1738. I bet it will run on plus 3 and plus 5 volts and do current out. Also the references to voltage out are after the I-V converter. They are probalbly stating that if you raise the output voltage, you get better dynamic range. We shall see. I will be calling them Monday and will let everyone know what they say. I hope it is a direct replacement for the 1738 because you could just swap them and get (hopefully) better sound.
Ric Schultz |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PCM1792 help needed! | SM7UYJ | Digital Source | 7 | 20th June 2011 07:59 AM |
| Need a DIY DAC Desgin for PCM1792 | dhayes5 | Digital Source | 3 | 7th September 2010 08:58 AM |
| Replace DSD1796 with DSD1792 | joonho75 | Digital Source | 0 | 30th March 2008 02:15 PM |
| Pcm1792 | luc888 | Digital Source | 0 | 25th September 2006 05:22 PM |
| who listened to DSD1792? | vincent_brient | Digital Source | 8 | 9th March 2005 05:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10466 seconds (79.94% PHP - 20.06% MySQL) with 10 queries |