|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
I understand that 16 bits can represent 65536 unique amplitude levels. Now dynamic range is defined as the difference between the maxiumum and minimum levels that can be represented.
Lets say that the minimum level is 0 and maxium level is 65536, so the dynamic range is 96.3db, or so I have read/heard in most places. However, although 16-bit does mean 65536 unique quantization levels, it is actually +32767 to -32767, so the maximum swing on each side of 0 is really only 32767. So why is the dynamic range based on 65536 levels of quantization and not 32767 ? Shouldn't the dynamic range of the 16-bit audio cd then be only 90.3db ? (that too only theoritically, would be still lower practically). Its like asking - is the dynamic range based on the peak signal level or the peak-peak signal level ? Am I thinking this through correctly ? or am I missing something big here ?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Music is AC signal so peak-peak.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
|
but in any other AC signal db gain/difference calculations - for example voltage gain - the voltage that is being referred is not p-p.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
|
I'm not really sure how to explain it other than, the signal is still being described by 16 bits, so it doesnt matter if part of the signal goes below "0 volts" ... its still 96dB.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi It is not an AC signal ! The levels go from 0 - 65536 They are just offset in some DACs Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Scuse me, but is peak to peak applicable here? We're talking "ones" and "zeros"--2^16--here, aren't we?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Yes it is. We're talking about signal peaks. The question really is, is RMS applicable here?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
The minimum swing isn't 1bit on each side (two bits). It's just 1 toggling bit (half bit on each side So, if the signal's minimum value is 1bit peak-peak and the maximum value is 65536 peak-peak, the dynamic range is 6.02*n or 98dB for n=16. Theoretically, the dynamic range is even higher for 1.76dB (sine signal). In practice, 90dB is a more realistic value. Regards, Milan |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynamic Range...? | Lyra | Digital Source | 40 | 2nd October 2007 11:44 PM |
| SNR/Dynamic range worsens in low frequency range. | percy | Digital Source | 3 | 1st June 2006 12:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09289 seconds (83.77% PHP - 16.23% MySQL) with 10 queries |