|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
|
turtle,
but Audigy (1 and 2 both) has Firewire out ![]() Not that you can use it for DVD-A digital output (at least not yet) AFAIK. I knew you meant this, but I needed to clarify so others would not misunderstand it. regards, Halcyon |
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland, Ostrobothnia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
http://www.1394ta.org/Press/2002Pres...er/9.23.ti.htm /UrSv |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland, Ostrobothnia
|
Have to correct myself a bit.
The original S/PDIF standard states: Audio format : linear 16 bit default, up to 24 bit expandable Allowed sampling frequencies (Fs) of the audio: 44.1kHz from CD 48 kHz from DAT 32 kHz from DSR Now manufacturers are already using 24 bit 96 kHz without problems, because there are no limitations in the S/PDIF interface for higher sampling frequencies. I don't see why not 192 kHz could be used. It is just a matter of higher bitrates and getting the right chips. Note that the professional balanced AES/EBU interface can not without problem use 24 bit, because it uses some bits for other information. This is not the problem with the consumer S/PDIF interface. |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
|
Johan:
Are the higher bitrates part of an amended spec? The bit format might be able to carry the non-spec information, but does the bandwidth of the connection itself allow that? (I don't know, I'm asking). With the amount of data you're talking about, it's a lot of bandwidth.
__________________
== John == |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
AFAIK there are no 192kHz SP/DIF recievers.
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland, Ostrobothnia
|
No, I don't really know. Of course it is out of the original spec to run for instance 96 kHz, but that is exactly what a lot of PC sound card manufacturers are allowing.
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I don't know any of this stuff really but what is the Sanyo receivers we read about (check LC89055W):
http://www.semic.sanyo.co.jp/solution/vrs/vrs_dir_e.htm Or (CS8416): http://www.cirrus.com/design/product...ail.cfm?d=1005 Aren't those 192 kHz SPDIF receivers? /UrSv |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Hi,
My M-audio superdac works pretty well at 24bit/96khz connected to an Audiophile 2496 pc card with standard 75 ohm 5 mm CATV coax. As far as I now all M-Audio stuff uses native sample rates, no resampling at all. Only standard oversampling. But why do you want 192kHz? There are no standard software carriers for it except your harddisc. |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland, Ostrobothnia
|
What do you mean with "standard software carriers"? DVD-Audio is a standard and it supports 192kHz.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading from Audigy 2ZS? | cjv998 | Digital Source | 4 | 17th July 2007 02:41 AM |
| Audigy 2ZS soundcard | pinkmouse | Everything Else | 9 | 14th November 2006 09:26 AM |
| Audigy 2 ZS vs DAC PCM2702 | MarasK | Digital Source | 0 | 1st July 2005 11:04 AM |
| Bl**dy Audigy... sugestions, please! | sobazz | Everything Else | 12 | 7th March 2004 11:48 PM |
| More Audigy 2 Warning | fmak | Digital Source | 5 | 9th February 2003 01:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |