|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: denmark
|
Hey guys my first post
I was wondering if you expert people could help, my DAC uses two 2uf output coupling capacitors, what would happen if I’d get rid of them and replace them with simple wire? Would it be safe? What would the effects be? Or for a second option, how much smaller can their value be and what would be the sonic effects? I have seen some designs where they got rid of them? And I was wondering if that would be possible in any DAC. Thx for the help francesco |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austria, near Linz
|
Just measure if there is any DC offset on the input side of the cap, in any case (permanently and/or which powering on). If yes, you cannot omit it easily, you can always try to substitute with something better. Why not buy two Blackgates?
__________________
/alohka/ |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Because there are better caps .... Overpriced .... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: denmark
|
i have already bought two mundorf silverg gold
but i was wondering if no cap would be better the audio note 4 and 5 do not have any i'll try to check if there is any dc as you suggested lohk thxs a lot for the help what happens changing the values to smaller ones? is this going to effect only the bass or else? francesco |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: .
|
Would this perchance be the DAC72 shown in a previous post? If it is removing the coupling caps from a valve based output stage would be an unwise thing to do. The Audio Notes dacs have transformers hence the lack of coupling caps.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: denmark
|
Sure it is. sounds lovely already, but i am sure it can be much improved.
Any advice on how to mod the dac would be more than welcome. i already realised -thxs to your responses- that that was not a wise idea. What about smaller values? Like 1.5 instead of 2uf? What difference would they make? francesco |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: britain
|
Well if there is a resistor to ground after the cap lowering the capacitor rolls off the bass.
If so it depends on the value of the resistor, for example in my player the cap is 1uf and the resistor 33K which is ok, any lower gentle rolls off bass (not such a bad thing but it can cause phase error) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Just to clarify what others have said, to figure out the smallest cap size that makes sense, use the formula
C = 1/(2 * pi * F * R) where C is the cap size, F is the 3dB rolloff frequency you are willing to accept, and R is the impedence (resistance) seen by the cap. F should probably be 2Hz or smaller as you will get phase distortions for a full decade above the 3dB point. R is the input impedence of the next stage in parallel with the resistor to ground of this stage. So, assume that there is a 50K resistor to ground, and the input impedence of your preamp is 50K, then C = 1/(2 * pi * 2 * 25K) so you would want a cap size of 3.2uF. Note that you can reduce the size cap you need slightly by increasing the resistor to ground after the cap to something liek 100K though too high can cause noise. Also, if your stereo only reproduced frequencied down to something like 50Hz, then you can use a higher 3dB point (5Hz in this case.) -d |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
|
You should think fast switching soft recovery diodes, 4 of them for each bridge rectifier. There are 6 bridge rectifiers in total, so you'll need 24 diodes. This will improve the sound a lot, but requires careful soldering and implementation because you are not allowed to make mistakes here.
Extreme_Boky |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: denmark
|
thxs guys
Extreme_Boky so i have been told! that the diodes would make a big difference, i know about the cheaper solution with 4 diodes x rectifier Schematics here http://www.hificollective.co.uk/pdf/diode.pdf However is there a cleaner solution, although might be more expensive, to do this with one single piece to replace the PEC 0483 GBU 4K that i have inside now? or any other suggestion about the DAC72? I have attached a picture of the board (also in another thread but no replies there) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why did Marantz use 4 capacitors for coupling? | bleachershane | Digital Source | 4 | 5th April 2009 11:04 PM |
| paralleling output coupling capacitors | kardelz | Parts | 1 | 29th March 2009 07:22 PM |
| Polarized capacitors for coupling | NIC1138 | Parts | 7 | 1st June 2007 08:37 PM |
| AC coupling capacitors... | Frazzled | Solid State | 8 | 30th June 2004 06:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10647 seconds (78.73% PHP - 21.27% MySQL) with 11 queries |