|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi all,
HDTV is coming to the UK. Can an HD ready TV only display HD signals by using an HDMI connector? The salesperson also said that there are DVD recorders that can record and display HD signals. How do I recognise an HD ready recorder? Can an older TV that accepts RGB, Svideo, commponent video as well as composite video be used to display high definition signals?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Quote:
Better to have a built in tuner for free over the air broadcasts. Generally cable and sat providers are using their own standards. So will have to get a tuner from their suppliers anyway. T Quote:
Quote:
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|||
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Hi Andrew,
Quote:
An 'older' TV cannot, by definition (no pun intended), display an HD signal without prior down conversion to a normal definition signal. Obviously the down converter could supply the normal definition picture by any of the usual analogue connection systems - composite, S video, RGB, YUV component, etc. Quote:
The BBC plans to transmit an HD service on Freeview, I gather. Domestic HD recorders, either DVD or hard disc based, will, presumeably, interface to future HD Freeview boxes. The other main source of HD material for the domestic viewer will clearly be some form of HD DVD system. There is obviously a hold up on the roll out of a domestic HD capable disc system due to the lack of ratification for the competing proposed systems - HD Dvd and BlueRay. (Everybody remembers the VHS vs Betamax thing, right?) It's interesting to note that the vast majority of 'HD Ready' screens available to buy right now at your local Comet. Dixons, etc. are far from HD capable. Just because a screen is 'capable' of displaying a down converted HD signal doesn't mean you are going to be overwhelmed by the true HD experience. Most 'HD Ready' screens (primarily Plasma & LCD panels) are simply re-packaged Wide XGA panels operating at a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. The current HD specification for future transmissions is based on a pixel resolution of 1920x1080, in various flavours of progressive (1080p) and interlaced (1080i). The difference in quality when viewing a 1920 x 1080 picture on a native pixel screen (as opposed to a Wide XGA) is, simply, staggering. ![]() Manufacturers are slowly responding to this demand - check out these: The Toshiba 47WLT66 lcd screen: http://www.home-entertainment.toshib...6?opendocument The Toshiba 42WLT66 lcd screen: http://www.home-entertainment.toshib...6?opendocument No commercial endorsement implied - there are just very few yet available. My feeling is that there are going to be quite a number of 'HD Ready' purchasers that are going to be very disappointed/angry in the near future. ![]() Regards, Ian |
||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Very nice post Ian!
Quote:
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
thanks. Sounds like some of the info from sales is incorrect. If the DVD recorder system cannot cope with HD signals, then can the SKY HD box which has a hard disc recording facility built in cope with storing the full resolution? or is SKY HD storing at a lower resolution more suited to the kid on "HD ready" TVs that do not display at 1080lines? From what you are saying I may well be asking these questions again in 12/24months. Why, because sales are not going to be honest when a buyer asks what he/she is getting from them.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
It's still all in it's infancy, but the current state of affairs is:
Connection to the screen is via either HDMI or component connections, the new Sky+HD has both. Suitable sets have an 'HD Ready' logo which ensures compatibility, 'HD Resolution' doesn't guarantee it. Sky are currently broadcasting HD programming ready for the launch of Sky HD in May - boxes aren't available yet, but will be a new Sky+HD, with 160Gb recording space. The BBC will be doing tests via satellite (Astra 28.2), probably during the world cup, and the Sky+HD boxes will be able to receive these as well. FTA HD boxes should be able to receive the BBC tests as well. The Sky+HD boxes will record the direct digital data stream, as current Sky+'s do, so the quality will be exactly the same as off-air. Freeview! - the BBC are doing tests this summer in London only, for a VERY! small number of viewers (a few hundred or so). As for an actual service?, at the present time it's a huge problem as the bandwidth isn't available terrestrially. Personally I see no real reasoning behind terrestrial digital at all?, far better coverage and much more bandwidth via satellite. As for recorders?, the whole point of the HDMI interface is to prevent you recording the signals - the copyright holders don't like the idea of people making HD copies of their programming.
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Nigel,
Quote:
Digital is my only alternative unless I wish to keep that Austrailian in Rolls Royces and private jets. HD reception from SKY looks like costing £700 to £800 per annum in reception fees plus the cost of sky box (£300) plus the HD tv. I can control the HD tv and budget for it. Sky's greed is beyond my control. Terrestial digital is my only cheap option.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Durham UK
|
Hello Andrew,
Just get yourself a Freeview STB for now if you dont allready have one, freeview is actually quite good. I dont have Sky TV and never will, its a rip off. If you want HD then you will have to wait for Freeview to go HD ( you will be waiting a long time) or get yourself a satellite TV box (note not Sky) which will get u a lot of channels for free. For more information have a look at this forum http://www.satellites.co.uk/ IF you are quick with a purchase of a HD sat box you will be able to watch the world cup in HD. Kram |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
Quote:
You DO require a Sky Digibox and a Freesat card (£20 one of fee) to get Ch4 and Ch5 as these are currently encrypted, or an expired Sky card works as a freesat card as well. Apart from those any FTA digital satellite box will do - but a Sky Digibox is the easiest choice. You can also order it directly from Sky, where it costs £150, including the box, card, and installation - which is certainly losing BSkyB money (which you might enjoy?). Another option is to subscribe to Sky, so you get the free box, card and installation, with a minimum monthly subscription - this is less than £150, and after a year you cancel, and keep all the equipment (this will lose BSkyB even more money!).
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HDTV to PC | Nixie | Parts | 10 | 13th March 2006 12:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.27076101 seconds (87.36% PHP - 12.64% MySQL) with 10 queries |