|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
|
Hi,
Long time reader, first time poster. Like so many others here, I've put together a TDA1543 DAC to venture into the DIY DAC world. For starters, I've intended to keep the circuit roughly according to the datasheets of the respective components. But the problem I have now is that the DAC sounds good only at low volume and distorts badly when the samples reach a certain level. (Tested with a SlimDevices SqueezeBox, which has a digital volume control.) See eg http://my.opera.com/lasso/homes/albu...osc440Hz_1.png . Links to more pictures below. More details: The main components: * TORX173 optical jack (TTL out) * CS8414 receiver * TDA1543 * 7805 regulators The CS8414 is surface mounted on an adapter. I started with only one regulator for all components. (While searching for errors I added a separate 7805 for the TDA1543, but to no avail.) Missing from the schematics are 100 nF on each of the V+/V- pairs on the CS8414. At first I thought that I might have fried the CS8414 or that the TDA1543 might have been defect, but I've tried exchanging them and I still get exactly the same behaviour. I've also tried adding more capacitance to V+ and V- of the TDA1543, but it didn't change anything. Schematics, images of the prototype board and screenshots of the recordings are here: http://my.opera.com/lasso/albums/show.dml?id=45429 . Could the oscillation-like spikes be caused by digital switching? If so, how easiest to remedy that? I'm aware that digital circuits should be given special care, but I also would like to keep the circuit as simple as possible while breadboarding. Hence no abundance of regulators, ferrite beads and so on. But apparently the circuit is a little too simplistic and/or plain wrong. :-) Either in the design, or that the layout is done in such a way so that this problem is caused. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions? Do I need to provide more information, and if so, what? Any help would be truly appreciated! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
The traditional waveform for testing a DAC is a ramp. Nevertheless, your picture shows that the initial problem is something to do with the MSB as the waveform changes polarity from + to -. After that, for some reason, the next most significant bit seem to get its knickers in a twist (technical term). The 1543 is a current DAC and it looks as though it's not seeing a proper load. I'd be looking very hard at soldered joints into the I to V convertor.
A photograph is always helpful.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: .
|
I notice the dac chip seems to have been painted over. Are you sure it is a TDA1543 and not a TDA1543A or a TDA1545A, as at first glance everything else seems okay.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: High Point, NC
|
Mode is set wrong. Need to do something with pins 13 and 16
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
|
Thank you for all your comments. I follow up below.
Quote:
http://my.opera.com/lasso/homes/albu...40_tda1543.png Just to make sure that my measurements weren't totally off, I also took the output straight from the SqueezeBox DAC. It shows a little ripple at the extremes, but is otherwise ok: http://my.opera.com/lasso/homes/albu...squeezebox.png About joints: I've doublechecked all the joints and reheated all of them. All of them seem to be good, but still the same results. (Or did I misunderstand you?) Quote:
But the thought that I had got TDA1543A has struck me... But then I'd assume that they wouldn't even work for low volumes, since the input format is totally different? Quote:
I just did a quick test, setting pin 13 low and pin 16 high, which would indicate that I want to see only channel information and won't have a clock connected to pin 13. Same result as earlier. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
The 440Hz sawtooth waveform shown in your second graphic is a good test waveform. Assuming that the settings on your "oscilloscope" (soundcard?) are the same, the first graphic is a disaster. There's something seriously wrong and the DAC doesn't appear to be reading the data correctly at all.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
|
Yep, the settings are the same, and yep, I'm using my soundcard for looking at the signal. It isn't too bad for superficially looking at an audio signal, but of course I stand no chance of analysing eg the digital data that goes into the dac. Maybe I'll get an oscilloscope one day...
I've now redone the whole I/V stage in a new position on the protoboard, and triplechecked all the connections on the CS8414 with the datasheet and my schematics. No difference schematics-wise, but still the same (bad) result. I did an image search for TDA1543, and most of them have a printed line on them between pin 1 and 8, approximately. Eg: http://www.kyohritsu.com/CATALOG/SEM...TO/tda1543.jpg . However, my chips lack the line: http://my.opera.com/lasso/homes/albu.../tda1543_1.jpg http://my.opera.com/lasso/homes/albu.../tda1543_2.jpg Can't say if it means anything. I'll try to get hold of a TDA1543 from another source to try with. (I already have CS8414 from two different sources, and they both act the same.) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
|
The TDA1543s look strange to me... Too lazy to check the schematic........
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Where did you source them from ? (maybe sourced from old cd players, and damaged during removal ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: marseille
|
..."But the thought that I had got TDA1543A has struck me... But then I'd assume that they wouldn't even work for low volumes, since the input format is totally different"
when you feed a 16 bit DAC with a 18 bits stream ,,you get the same behaviour your DAC present . |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wtb: Tda1543 | leadbelly | Swap Meet | 0 | 19th October 2006 05:42 AM |
| TDA1543/CS8414 Problems... | john65b | Digital Source | 10 | 6th October 2006 02:19 PM |
| TDA1543 dac | dariusku | Digital Source | 3 | 31st March 2006 06:38 PM |
| TDA1543 Non OS DAC | jean-paul | Digital Source | 83 | 22nd January 2004 10:27 PM |
| TDA1543 DAC problems -- advice? | Nathan Lewis | Digital Source | 13 | 25th November 2003 01:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12418 seconds (81.07% PHP - 18.93% MySQL) with 11 queries |