|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Essentially this is true when data is considered, but lower jitter in the SPDIF stream means lower jitter in the recovered clock inside the DAC. Remember any PLL is an attenuator, less garbage in - less garbage out. I haven't found any DAC yet that is fully insensitive to its' SPDIF input. best |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Who sais it's going to get SPDIF input?
It's directly connected from servo processor to DAC. |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, here's my clock:
![]() It has both an inverted and non inverted output. I'm going to check it first on my work tomorrow before I put it in. I know me I also already changed the opams to AD8620, replaced the KA regulators for MC types. Those are four times less noisy. Replace the big caps with 4700 uF Panasonic FC's, and the smaller ones, after the regulators and by the opamps, and DAC with 220 uF 25 V rubbicon ZL. I also replace the rectifier diodes with schottky's. I also bypassed the elco's at the opamps with a 100nF ceramic cap, and also the diodes. I notice a slightly better bass performance, and it appears to have more detail and seems quieter. But it's to ba that I don't have any reference (unmodded version) to compare with. I bet part of it is just my mind playing tricks with me |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Great! Now, what do you think about the sound? (By the way, the ringing on the square wave is probably for the same reason that mine rang, 'scope ground lead inductance.)
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, it's hard to say what the sound is like. It was good before, and is good now. But with my headphones I think I notice that everything comes more loose from the headphones. It's as if the sound is not comming directly from the speakers. Sounds more natual. The rest is basicly the same I guess. It's to bad that I don't have any unmodded player to check the difference though. I'm alway's highly suspicious with these kinds of tweaks
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Good to see all works like intended. Bear in mind that digital gear needs some days to run in again. Did you check the mains chord polarisation as well ? best |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Project - Marantz CD5400 modding (pics) | iamwhoiam | Digital Source | 46 | 16th June 2010 02:52 AM |
| Marantz CD5400 - stuck cd drawer | Bobby_MC | Digital Source | 0 | 16th April 2009 03:56 PM |
| Marantz CD5400 Output Stage | iamwhoiam | Digital Source | 0 | 25th January 2005 09:22 PM |
| Clock replacement for Philips SACD1000 | Hercules | Digital Source | 12 | 27th November 2004 11:56 AM |
| Marantz CD5400 Tweak | dh001 | Digital Source | 0 | 18th December 2003 11:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10037 seconds (83.98% PHP - 16.02% MySQL) with 11 queries |