|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sounds like real fun
![]() Let me tell you want I might want to do to my CD-5400: - replace opamps with AD8620 - remove muting, and maybee replace it with a relay - remove or replace out caps. - replace dac with a CS4398 - do some power supply tweaks - replace crystal stuff I guess, I'll first replace the opamps. But I'll take it slowly
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Looks like I may be able to postpone the screaming. Here's what I found on J013 (which definitely goes to pin 6 of IC14, the manual and real-life agree).
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
I intend to start by improving the clock - that's a serious weakness. I might replace the muting with relays, and might well replace the coupling capacitors. I have a pair of AD8620, so they might go in. Frankly, the change that will make the biggest difference is the clock. Everything else is just polishing.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hmm, 16.89 is also not in the DAC datasheet. The closest is 16.9344 Mhz.... Could that be a match? That would also account for the 8.4672 Mhz crystal I guess (it's half of that.
But how to get on now? Rip out the that BU... thing, and replace it with a simple and good clock circuit? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Yes, don't worry that the oscilloscope didn't measure frequency all that accurately; I'm sure it meant to say "16.9344MHz" but stumbled over the pronunciation. No need to rip out the BU... thing, just cut a track (once I've worked out where).
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, that's also fine
But what about the connection from the BU to the TC94A14FA? And then I mean pins 34,35 and 36 specificly?
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
That's trickier. At first, I was worried that the micro was really the master clock, but if you look, it uses the 16.9344MHz clock that arrives on pin 46. But the circuit diagrams and data sheets don't make sense to me. According to the Rohm BU2630 data sheet, pins 7, 8, and 9 are determinedly digital inputs, yet the Marantz diagram shows them connected to analogue signals. Something is wrong here.
What we expect to find is some sort of a master oscillator, followed by a frequency synthesizer to allow that frequency to be varied. We expect that variable frequency to go to the CD motor servo to control the speed of data read off disc and we expect it to go to the DAC to allow the DAC to cope with data having a variable sample frequency. We would expect that when variable pitch isn't engaged that the multiplication ratio of the frequency synthesizer would be an integer (2).
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I dug a bit further and found that the pins are actually refering to TMP87PS71AF (IC71). There pins 34,35 and 36 are actually labled SDA, SCL and PLL, and this is the uC that controls the whole thing, and they are connected to a general purpuse IO pin. So I guess those are used to setup pitch stuff. I guess, you can just leave it away Might be some obfuscation in the manual to make it harder to understand? So I guess, you'll just have to insert a fesh clock into the point labled "DSP" and cut the rest loose? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Quote:
There's only one way of proving it. Put a fixed 16.9344MHz clock in to feed the DAC and the controller and see if it works. Watch this space...
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Do you have one?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Project - Marantz CD5400 modding (pics) | iamwhoiam | Digital Source | 46 | 16th June 2010 03:52 AM |
| Marantz CD5400 - stuck cd drawer | Bobby_MC | Digital Source | 0 | 16th April 2009 04:56 PM |
| Marantz CD5400 Output Stage | iamwhoiam | Digital Source | 0 | 25th January 2005 10:22 PM |
| Clock replacement for Philips SACD1000 | Hercules | Digital Source | 12 | 27th November 2004 12:56 PM |
| Marantz CD5400 Tweak | dh001 | Digital Source | 0 | 18th December 2003 12:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11393 seconds (81.62% PHP - 18.38% MySQL) with 11 queries |