|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here's my attempt on building a simple non-oversampling dac. I'd like comments on the lay-out.
Filtercomponents and the dac are placed on the downside. There are two smoothing regulators in the picture but I will only use one. Green is earth. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You can't tell me this dac is perfect
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Adelaide
|
Quote:
Groundplane? Control of RF? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: middle of nowhere...
|
my friend - TDA1543 is VERY sensitive on the quality of the power supply.... no good quality power - no good sound.... i am affraid that using only one three terminal power supply regulator without anything that is better quality than that would not be enough to achive very good sounding dac.... well - it will be easier to make - but i am affraid that it would not be good quality...... than again - it is only my insignificant opinion about that.....
hope this helps best regards |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
What else can I do to control RF? Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Adelaide
|
So how do you know that the lack of groundplane contributes to the good sound? More to the point, how do you know that it would not sound even better with a groundplane?
Your design regime seems to be one of picking odd ideas from other designs without really understanding why they were used. (Something sometimes called a cargo cult design.) If you do this fine, but then why ask for advice about the design? You have clearly already decided what to use. Same goes for power supply, and layout. There are very good reasons for great care being taken. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
PS. I'm making a version WITH groundplane right know, so I can built that and simply compare with my ears |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Listen to Francis. He knows of what he speaks. For evidence, here is a thread where he walked me through a 1543 based design, the results of which are excellent. http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=149056
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cs8412 - Pcm63 Non-oversampling | maartentje | Digital Source | 29 | 27th November 2011 07:02 PM |
| Native non-oversampling Grundig player (TDA1543) | Calamaro | Digital Source | 5 | 10th April 2009 09:11 PM |
| TDA1543 and CS8412 NOS DAC | Igla | Digital Source | 3 | 7th March 2006 07:27 PM |
| DIY Fidelity TDA1543 Non-oversampling DAC | DIAR | Digital Source | 24 | 19th May 2005 03:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10208 seconds (82.75% PHP - 17.25% MySQL) with 11 queries |