|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Some of the stuff on my equipment :- 'Mega Bass' :- it isn't bass unless it's mega! 'Super Bass" :- up there with mega 'Linear Phase Full Digital Processing' - nobody wants partial digital processing that just doesn't cut it! In terms of formats I guess it's down to whatever the large corporations decide to back. Fancy a dvd recorder? good luck ! http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/...sExplained.asp Blu- ray, HD-DVD ![]() Kind regards, Ashley. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Adelaide
|
This stuff is so old and worn it is depressing. It must be at least 10 years that I have been posting on the rec.audio.hi-end newsgroup trying to dispel some of these silly myths. Nothing seems to change. Even the attitudes remain the same.
So, very quickly. The duality between amplitude and time is well understood in sampled systems. For many many decades. There is nothing special or new about the idea of dithereing with temporal jitter, and it is used in some sigma delta ADCs. No big deal at all. Notice that this at the ADC end. Dither is never added at the DAC end. But there seems to be staggering mis-understanding amongst the innumerate golden eared. None of them seems to have anythinbg but he foggiest idea of how dither works or why it is used. There is pompous parotting of the scribbling of other golden eared fools who themselves misunderstand the mechanisms. Once and for all time. Dither does not mask the quantisation noise. It is not a matter of drowning it out. It eliminates it. If you don't understand why, can't do the mathematics, which are mostly engineerring undergraduate level, there is little we can do. It is like argueing with someone who can't see about what colour red looks like. These people don't know enough to even understand why they might be wrong. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Arcing KT-88 and GLY513 ASC 600uF - Too Much of a Good Thing? | drj759 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 26th July 2009 11:51 PM |
| Jitter - gone for good? | audio_tony | Digital Line Level | 48 | 1st February 2009 02:55 AM |
| is a resolution of 0,001 UI good to measure clock jitter ? | Bernhard | Digital Line Level | 1 | 8th December 2008 02:01 PM |
| NOS Transistors and Tubes Always A Good Thing? | DreadPirate | Solid State | 1 | 1st October 2007 09:47 PM |
| MOSFET nonlinearity might just be a good thing! | Circlotron | Solid State | 5 | 26th May 2003 02:32 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07373 seconds (73.23% PHP - 26.77% MySQL) with 10 queries |