|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
|
Hi !
I am about to buy a new CD player. So far, I have narrowed the choice on two CD players. 1.Rotel RCD-02 and 2. Marantz Cd-7300 Rotel costs around 350 EUR and Marantz around 500. I can not decide which one to buy. Did anyone heard any of these players? Pros and cons? Disregarding the price difference, which one would you buy and why? I need quick advise, so pls help! Thanks a lot! Vix |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
|
Sorry, it is Rotel RCD-02. Typing mistake.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Adelaide
|
Hi.
Wish I knew, sorry. I've had a quick look around in the past week or so, and the Rotel RCD-1070 looks pretty good. The RCD-02 is similar, but cut-down in the areas of power supplies and dual -everything that the 1070 has. It's (the RCD-02) definitely worth a listen, and you can bank on it being well built. Not had a look at the Marantz at all. The NAD players are starters here, but I had terrible experience with faulty units the first time I bought NAD, so not an option for me. I've never noticed much in the way of current equipment comment on this site. I guess we're all trying to avoid buying new gear, and having fun improving the old stuff! Michael
__________________
My AudioProjects Gallery |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hampshire
|
Hi there!
I owned an RCD-02 for about a year before selling it on. It's fantastcally well built for the price, nice and heavy as well. However I have to say the sound left me feeling cold. It never really blossoms and makes listening to music an event. Little sterile sounding, very dry. However it is good with HDCD discs. As always though best to arrange a dem. if possible - everyoen has different tastes. Cheers, - John |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bangkok
|
I've just bought CD7300 for a couple of months. The great thing about this marantz is the sonic impact, very dynamic and full of strong bass. The sound stage and resolution are also excellant. If you love dynamic and impact, you won't be disappointed anymore.
Compare to RCD02, the marantz is a better choice. Kittikun |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
|
Thanks for the answers.
I have however decided to buy Rotel. Not the best thing around, but certainly worth the money. regards, Vix |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
|
Marantz engineers make their equipment sound rich and "natural".
Every single Rotel unit I heard sounded cold and lifeless. Applies to their CD players in particular. Amplifiers are ok. (hmmmm...) The real puzzle is: Rotel CD players are very well designed units - but still sound cold. The trick is in tweaking the sound to appeal more to us humans. Extreme_Boky |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Technics SU-7300 distortion | alexo | Solid State | 1 | 22nd January 2009 06:37 PM |
| Coupling Rotel RCD855 & Marantz CD52 | Klimon | Digital Source | 4 | 18th July 2007 09:02 PM |
| Marantz CD 7300 Tuning | Kal | Digital Source | 6 | 28th July 2006 11:55 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |