|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
hi,
I am planning to built a non-oversampling DAC based on TDA1541A. Would someone kindly point me to some place where I can learn how to built a sinx/x filter to compensate the non-oversampling's roll off? Thanks Pat |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
See Thorstens comments at:
http://pub4.ezboard.com/ffakeidsfrm1...icID=359.topic and: http://pub4.ezboard.com/ffakeidsfrm1...icID=361.topic This is for the TDA1543, but the theory remains the same for the TDA1541. Have fun, Fedde |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
|
Hi Patwen & Fedde,
My opinion on the sin(x)/x issue, i.e. slight rolloff of at 20kHz in a NON-OS DAC is reflected here: http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.pl?f...light=sinx/x&r It is quite clear that Thorsten and me disagree about the subject. I made the choice for a perfect <B><i>square wave</B></I> and needle <B><I>pulse</B></I> response; Thorsten chose a perfect <B><I>amplitude</B></I> response. Given the phase response of his network has square wave must be looking horrible. I tried notch filters too and was not satisfied with these. Please also note that most of my experiments are with the AD1865, while Thorsten uses TDA1543 and TDA1541. The AD DAC is a much more bright and alive DAC than the Philips~!
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
I guess you guys like listening to ultrasonic noise. Can't bend the laws of physics. Wadia tried............
Jocko |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
|
If it is ultrasonic, how can you hear it?
![]() ![]() ![]() Art
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
When it causes the cheap op-amp they are using to generate IMD products that fall into the audio band.
Jocko |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
|
Ohhhhh........ Does IMD stand for Idiots Must be Deaf?
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
May I ask why you are planning to use this chip? Have it? Haven't you thought about of using a top modern chip instead? Make it easy for you and skip the sinx/x thing. I don't want to spoil your fun but you may experience more fun with a new cool chip. Crystal CS43122 Crystal CS4390 AKM AK4395 Analog Devices AD1955
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
I've tried telling them over and over again. Why do you think they will listen to you instead?
Jocko |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
|
Because he is Peranders, and he is am extreme designer, man, where you are usually a troublemaker.....
![]() Sin Bin by Sundown, Ren |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with filter design | skyraider | Instruments and Amps | 3 | 14th October 2008 12:01 AM |
| TDA1541A design, which one? | DragonMaster | Digital Source | 0 | 13th August 2005 05:48 PM |
| Was: sinx/x. Now: standardisation (CE & TÜV ) / protectionism | Elso Kwak | Everything Else | 43 | 27th September 2002 07:35 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |