|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
|
I see in many schematics for this part that the analog and digital grounds are seperated by a 10 ohm resistor.
I thought instead on my board that I would try to create (if possible) isolated traces on all analog and digital connections with every trace grounded at the filter cap ground. Wouldn't that be a superior method....and could I eliminate the 10 ohm resistor? THANKS. --Mike |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I wouldn't recommend this due to the inductance of the individual traces. I would read the application notes and see if they provide any general guidelines.
Conventional practice with DACs has been to have a digital ground plane and an analog ground plane that meet at just one point under the dac, and this seems like pretty good practice for a 2902 as well. In some cases one very solid ground plane has been used with good results as well. Kevin |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
|
So the resistor isn't needed?
I thought the star system of dedicated traces and a SINGLE grounding point was ideal in any system? I need to learn more about this......a large (low inductance) ground plane vs the star system. Perhaps I should do the analog grounds in a star and use a single ground plane for the digital with everything going to the chip ground? |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
I put my thoughts on paper, long ago http://www.tentlabs.com/Info/Article...decoupling.pdf It may help you in learning about the subject Again, don't trust semiconductors manufacturers app notes, I once improved a demo board using my philiosophy: The jitter decreased by a fair amount and noise went down 30 dB........ cheers |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
He is right..........I found out the hard way not to listen to semi manufacturers. Anyone who closely examines some of my old stuff may find that out.
Jocko |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
|
wow.
nice bit of reading for me.....thanks very much. --Mike |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
|
Is there an advantage at all to having (completely) seperate power supplys?
One for the analog DC....the other for the digital? With completely isolated ground planes for each? |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Hi Yes, crosstalk should be avoided, so seperating power supply circuits and decoupling helps On the groundplanes: Did you finish my article yet ? best regards |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digital or analog? | xplod1236 | Digital Source | 1 | 19th May 2005 02:15 AM |
| Analog vs. Digital XO | Seth Smith | Multi-Way | 11 | 1st June 2004 09:33 PM |
| digital or analog | electro samurai | Analogue Source | 7 | 29th February 2004 05:23 PM |
| Confused about Analog / Digital Grounds - TDA1541A | HeadSh0T | Digital Source | 2 | 17th April 2003 04:27 PM |
| Analog to Digital? | Ioannis | Digital Source | 5 | 11th December 2001 06:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10890 seconds (80.46% PHP - 19.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |