|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Hi,
Guido Tent adviced on another topic to send directly a low jitter clock to the DAC for the BCK signal, instead of using the BCK from the decoder/filter. old philips cdp mods This, for sure, will give a much cleaner clock to the DAC. But what about non oversampling DACs? For an I2S configuration, with a 11.2Mhz clock, tell me if I'm wrong but the BCK out of the decoder will be 2.8MHz (master clock/4) So, in a NON-OS configuration, how can we feed the DAC with this "direct clock". A solution would be to divide the master clock per 4 (with a counter or 2 D flip flops), but a problem seems to exist with this solution: we don't know "where" to divide the clock. I don't know if this explanation is clear, but the clock/4 can have 4 differents "phases" or "delays", it can have it's rising edge on the 1st, the 2nd, the 3rd or the 4th edge of the master clock. And if this divided clock doesn't have the edges at the right time (at the same time that the BCK outputted from the decoder) I think that nothing will work. Any ideas?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
Hi Bricolo You could use the low jitter clock to re-clock the BCK before feeding it to the DAC.
__________________
Regards Fin |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
I know this is one solution, but I was interested in the divide/4 problem more specificly
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: diepe zuiden
|
You can use an async fifo between dac and decoder.
Works for me
__________________
GuidoB |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Spot on ! cheers |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
yes, I know this would work.
but I wanted to know if the div/4 works or not
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Hi Should work as well, maybe timing spoils it |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
OK so I'll go for reclocking.
After all, having to divide and to reclock in order to attenuate the counter's jitter isn't easier
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
True, reclocking needs only 1 Dff (use low noise power supply here too......) succes |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 16.9344MHz LOW JITTER CLOCK KIT... | bleachershane | Digital Line Level | 146 | 4th July 2010 02:17 PM |
| low jitter clock help needed | atcgreg | Digital Line Level | 10 | 9th June 2009 07:58 AM |
| Clock Jitter Cleaners | coloradosound | Digital Line Level | 47 | 7th November 2008 02:54 PM |
| Clock in RME AD/DA 1nS Jitter! | fmak | Digital Source | 7 | 31st May 2004 08:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10251 seconds (80.61% PHP - 19.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |