cleanest/ easiest EQ - Page 2

seoman · 1st July 2005, 01:54 PM

If you use the digital out of your CD than, in my opinion, you are better off with de DEQ2496 (behringer).
It's pritty cheap and without using it's 'could be better' analog section you have almost limitless correction options.
You can easally store 64 memories with GEQs, DEQs, PEQs, limiters en stereo enhancers.

I use 't, to shute up some anoying tendencies of my room and speakers. En i'm pritty pleased with it.
I would never have been able to achieve that with other speakers or furniture moving.

So improve your overall sound and correct your misbehaving recordings.

Regards Simon

rick57 · 1st July 2005, 02:09 PM

Do you know the difference between the Behringer 248-96: DEQ & DCX?

Either of the are probably the frontrunners

Cheers

dwk123 · 1st July 2005, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rick57
Do you know the difference between the Behringer 248-96: DEQ & DCX?

Either of the are probably the frontrunners

Cheers

Two completely different beasts. The DCX is a crossover (which happens to have a bit of EQ capability) and the DEQ is a full-blown equalizer. If you aren't intending to use the Behringer as a crossover, the the DEQ is the unit you want.

If you're planning to use a PC as source, you can *probably* get equal/better results for less $$$ via either the built-in features of say winamp or foobar, or via VST plugins. However, I'm not sure how the usability would stack up.

seoman · 1st July 2005, 03:27 PM

Well one is a crossover with allot of equalizing power.
The other is a pure soundprocessor with a automatic room correction. And allthough not all do use that option i'm very pleased with it.

The difference between the old and new versions. Brain power and highres ad/da & pcm capabillities.

Thats all i know.

rick57 · 1st July 2005, 03:48 PM

an XO + lot of EQ v soundprocessor with auto EQ

So DCX = DCX XO + lot of EQ

& DEQ = soundprocessor with auto EQ??

seoman · 1st July 2005, 04:52 PM

yep
The DEQ also has a realtime analiser (61 bands)
Wich is very usefull but also fun to watch.
"t seems de DCX is slightly cheaper.

Download the manuals and see for yourself.
They both use the same technic but 1 has 6 channels to compute and the other only 2.
So i asume the DEQ does give you more processing power.

1st July 2005, 02:09 PM	#12
rick57 diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia	DEQ2496 Do you know the difference between the Behringer 248-96: DEQ & DCX? Either of the are probably the frontrunners Cheers

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Easiest way to cut PCB's?	Dr.H	Parts	38	25th May 2010 12:51 PM
Cleanest 12" high efficiency mids for the money?	BHTX	Multi-Way	31	16th July 2008 08:00 PM
Easiest way to correct this dip?	JCoffey	Multi-Way	12	11th June 2007 01:52 PM
cleanest drivers you've heard for <$30	johnnyb831	Multi-Way	1	29th July 2006 05:31 AM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

1st July 2005, 01:54 PM	#11
seoman diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Nijmegen	If you use the digital out of your CD than, in my opinion, you are better off with de DEQ2496 (behringer). It's pritty cheap and without using it's 'could be better' analog section you have almost limitless correction options. You can easally store 64 memories with GEQs, DEQs, PEQs, limiters en stereo enhancers. I use 't, to shute up some anoying tendencies of my room and speakers. En i'm pritty pleased with it. I would never have been able to achieve that with other speakers or furniture moving. So improve your overall sound and correct your misbehaving recordings. Regards Simon

1st July 2005, 03:27 PM	#14
seoman diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Nijmegen	Well one is a crossover with allot of equalizing power. The other is a pure soundprocessor with a automatic room correction. And allthough not all do use that option i'm very pleased with it. The difference between the old and new versions. Brain power and highres ad/da & pcm capabillities. Thats all i know.

1st July 2005, 03:48 PM	#15
rick57 diyAudio Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia	an XO + lot of EQ v soundprocessor with auto EQ So DCX = DCX XO + lot of EQ & DEQ = soundprocessor with auto EQ??

1st July 2005, 04:52 PM	#16
seoman diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Nijmegen	yep The DEQ also has a realtime analiser (61 bands) Wich is very usefull but also fun to watch. "t seems de DCX is slightly cheaper. Download the manuals and see for yourself. They both use the same technic but 1 has 6 channels to compute and the other only 2. So i asume the DEQ does give you more processing power.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)