my ad1853 layout.. thoughts? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th June 2005, 08:35 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
costiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: greece
Default my ad1853 layout.. thoughts?

ok.. this my final ad1853 dac layout.. any thoughts on it?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moddac.jpg (76.8 KB, 805 views)
__________________
i am currently using 60,000 uF of capacitance in my preamplifier..
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2005, 04:47 PM   #2
Mark Kravchenko --- www.kravchenko-audio.com
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Default Nice art work !

How about posting a schematic so we can compare the theory with the practical.

MArk
__________________
Mark
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2005, 06:47 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
costiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: greece
unfortunately no schematic in electronic form.. the i/v is simply this (from ad1853 datasheet): (implemented to house 4xsoic + 2xdip opa627).. the ic chain is as follows:
ua9637 RS422 differential receiver
dir1703
ad1853
6x opa627

a tl7733 is used to generate the reset signal and 2xadp3303-5 generate the digital and analog 5v for the AD. An additional 780-05 to provide for the UA9637 and an 78033 for the DIR..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg modododod.jpg (66.0 KB, 721 views)
__________________
i am currently using 60,000 uF of capacitance in my preamplifier..
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2005, 01:18 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
Hi,

Its not a bad layout.

I am assuming you have a power supply board somewhere and are connecting to the converter by connectors/wires?

I would recommend that you integrate the power supply onto the converter board. Remote PSUs (unless you are using a switchmode) are usually a waste of time and offer negligible performance gains in terms of both noise and distortion. Often this remote power approach actually introduces more noise due to the inherent cable and trace inductances.

Also I see that you are using separate ground planes for the different sections of the board. This is also often done to reduce digital noise from entering the analog circuitry, however many semiconductor manufacturers (and off memory Analog Devices have a very good app note on this) recommend a continuous ground plane. In my experience (power electronics, RF, digital audio and DSP background) this bears true.

Kirchoff's laws state that current flows in loops, however unless you can see the actual path taken by electrons it is better to let them decide where is the path of least inductance.

For instance in your connections between the converter and your analog stages you are using two separate planes. Yet you have the current output traces crossing this gap.

This would force the return current to flow from your analog stage, back to your powersupply (near the other supplies) and back to the converter via the relevant ground connection. Its a big loop. And loops radiate noise as well as receive it.

And you have big cuts in your planes... introducing more antenna/loops inductance effects.

Also of note is that if you mount the PSUs on the board near the relevant sections and run the secondary AC to them, you only have one frequency of noise to worry about (50/60Hz) local harmonic generation will be confined to the local loops (small) and thus this approach should be of lower noise.

And dont put any cuts in your plane across ANY clock signal... 24MHz digital audio clocks have odd harmonics extending into GHz and this will definitely be picked up by the rest of the board's loops...

Hope this helps!

Apollyon25
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2005, 07:13 AM   #5
banana is offline banana  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Hi costiss,

A good layout indeed. I like those I2S bus, short and direct.

I also agree with apollyon25 about continuous ground plane. I suggest the DAC analog section and the post filter section sharing common ground plane.

Attached my AD1853 layout.
Attached Images
File Type: gif ad1853 layout.gif (84.9 KB, 610 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2005, 09:44 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
costiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: greece
forgot to mention that: the i/v analog plane will be connected to the dac analog with some heavy gauge short cable.. its just that the space didnt allow for a single thick track to connect them both.. so its done with a cable soldered between them.. so is the case with the plane in front of the iv's.. theres actually sth like a star ground for the analog part, right where the guards connect.. regulation for the digital part and the dac analog supply are on board.. and i have provided for decoupling caps for each chip.. so i dont think there wikll be loops.. the only connection between the grounds of the supplies is on board, so no loops.. look, thats the cable connections..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moddac2.jpg (73.3 KB, 517 views)
__________________
i am currently using 60,000 uF of capacitance in my preamplifier..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2005, 03:59 AM   #7
AAK is offline AAK  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florida
Hi Costiss,

Your DAC board looks great. I also built a AD1853 DAC based on Analog Devices Eval board. I used a CS8414 decoder and op2604 opamps. I also designed a small power supply to use with it, and used a Digital Rheostat to control the output volume on board. It's a great sounding DAC. If you have any problems getting it working let me know. It's been a while since a built mine so I may have to refresh my memory but I'd be glad to help. Here's a pic.

Best regards,

Al
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img_1148.jpg (74.6 KB, 592 views)
__________________
Love when you can, Cry when you have to, be who you must, that's part of the plan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2005, 04:45 AM   #8
jleaman is offline jleaman  Belgium
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Send a message via AIM to jleaman
Quote:
Originally posted by AAK
Hi Costiss,

Your DAC board looks great. I also built a AD1853 DAC based on Analog Devices Eval board. I used a CS8414 decoder and op2604 opamps. I also designed a small power supply to use with it, and used a Digital Rheostat to control the output volume on board. It's a great sounding DAC. If you have any problems getting it working let me know. It's been a while since a built mine so I may have to refresh my memory but I'd be glad to help. Here's a pic.

Best regards,

Al

Got any pictures looking straight down at the boards ?

I like the psu boards Good job..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2005, 03:20 AM   #9
Leolabs is offline Leolabs  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Leolabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bukit Mertajam
Send a message via MSN to Leolabs
How does it work??
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2005, 11:37 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
Costiss,

I understand what you are trying to do, as I have designed a commercial D/A converter unit for a prominent audio company.

However you have missed the point of the whole loop conversation.

A cable as you have shown may work, but it is far from optimal.
You have to realise that there are lots of current loops in a circuit.
Decoupling capacitors really only supply a minimal amount of transient response energy to a device and usually perform the removal of HF noise currents from the device by shunting them to ground. Local reservoir capacitors should be used to supply the transient device currents (I use a bead inductor, an electrolytic capacitor, and a small ceramic decoupling capacitor mounted AT the supply pins).

Have a look at the attached pic. I have drawn on it to illustrate the problem areas. Also as far as I can tell there is no connection between the I/V input side and I/V output side of the ground plane... where are the currents going to get to ground?

Particularly important are the current outputs from the DAC. Have a look at the loop between the yellow scribbles and the green 'gnd cable' scribble... thats a big loop! I am sure it will pick up your EMI from the clocks nicely!

Similarly on the input to the converter.

Basically as a rule I try to route EVERYTHING on the top layer, and leave the bottom layer ENTIRELY ground. If there are any cuts for required tracks - move them away from critical areas.
Inputs to opamps are high impedance so they pick up LOTS of noise.

If you are making this board yourself pay (and dont have through hole plating) ensure you think about how you are actually going to solder the bits BOTH SIDES.

If you want to discuss this further I leave msn messenger running while I am at work (and often at home too)
apollyon25 at hotmail dot com

hope this helps
apollyon25
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moddac_gnd_loops.jpg (78.4 KB, 393 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guitar amp layout second thoughts mashaffer Tubes / Valves 2 24th April 2008 01:26 AM
It's my AD1853 DAC Kochkurov Maxim Digital Source 8 13th July 2006 03:03 PM
My new AD1853 dac AD1865 Digital Source 2 18th May 2005 12:15 AM
my ad1853 layout.. costiss Digital Source 0 23rd November 2004 11:22 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2