AD1865 vs PCM1704 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd September 2002, 01:42 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
steve jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver USA
Default AD1865 vs PCM1704

I'd be interested in hearing the opinions of anyone who has compared AD1865 and PCM1704 DAC chips in a non-oversampling circuit.

Which did you prefer.

TIA,
Steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 01:18 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
Not too many people experiment, aren't they?

I just want to keep the thread alive, because I'm curious myself.
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 04:37 PM   #3
jwb is offline jwb  United States
diyAudio Member
 
jwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, USA
Send a message via AIM to jwb
At $33/ea for one DAC chip, and hundreds of dollars in parts for a complete DAC, it is slightly painful to experiment with different parts or designs. What's really needed is a DIYAudio pow-wow where we can all huddle together and listen to our creations comparatively!
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 05:34 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Talking AD1865 vs PCM1704

Hi Steve,
The problem with the PCM1704 is that it is a 24 bit DAC.
The AD1865 is a 18 bit DAC but the CS8412 or 8414 can be put in 18 bit output mode. It are not really 18 bits but 16 bits plus two "stuffed" zero's. Consequently you have to stuff six zero's for the PCM1704. This can be accomplished with a shift register but will require this extra glue logic.
Some time ago I did compare AD1851, AD1865N; AD1865N-K and TDA1541AS1. I stepped on quite sensitive toes with my conclusions
The PCM1704 is resting in my famous shoebox for a with a sample rateconverter and DAC experiment (non-oversampling)
As I am quite happy with the AD1865N-K especially in conjunction with my asynchronous reclocker, the PCM1704 may rest in peace forever....
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 09:33 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
steve jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver USA
Cool Stayin' alive

Thanks for the replies. I guess I'm the one that's going to have to experiment.

I was trying to map out a strategy for doing a non-oversampling DAC board that I could add to an inexpensive DVD player and nixing a SPDIF connection. I'd use a Kwak Clock to help lower source jitter even more.

Figured that I could remove the existing DAC in the DVD player, and tap the internal MCLK, BCLK, LATCH, and SDATA (more than likely 24 bit Japanese/Sony/BB format and not I2S) traces to feed the new DAC board.

With the PCM1704, there would be minimal glue logic to attend to. As the 1704 can input 24 bit word length, a similar (but not identical, no need to shift the LATCH to mate with LSB in converting from I2S) logic scheme (gating BCLK to one channel) as the one detailed in AN-207 would work.

But those 1704-Ks are $39 each. Ouch.

The AD1865 sounded great 1X oversampled in my Audio Note DAC 1.2.

The problem in using the AD1865 in the DVD player application is it's 18 bit input. Guess I'll have to try a 6 bit shift register to align the down-going LATCH to the 18th bit of the 24 bit SDATA stream. But in doing so, any 96K/24 bit DVD or DAD data would be trunicated, and I know how bad that sounds at the 16 bit level. Would this matter ta 18 bit resolution? I dunno.

But I've got 4 pairs of stereo AD1865N-Ks. Differential/paralleling them all might bring its own rewards (like what Kondo did in the M100 Hibari DAC).

Gotta split for now. Thanks folks!

Steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 02:16 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
You wouldn't have a schematic or more info on that Hibari DAC maybe?
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 04:13 PM   #7
Cobra2 is offline Cobra2  Norway
DIY !
diyAudio Member
 
Cobra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Send a message via Skype™ to Cobra2
Talking DAC vs DAC...

Hi!
I might be on the edge of this thread...but I do not find the DAC-chip so important, as the implementation.

I just had my modified QED Digit Dac tested with my "favorite" Hi-Fi-pusher, he even tried it in his own home system. And he concluded that it played like a U.S.$ 1400-1500,- CD-player, but was beaten by a $ 2500,- one....

Arne K
NORWAY
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2002, 05:05 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
steve jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver USA
Default Hibari info

Here's a few links to the Audio Note Japan website:

http://www.audionote.co.jp/digital/content.htm

http://www.audionote.co.jp/digital/essay.htm

There was another webpage that showed the guts of the DAC, but it has been pulled. Might have shown too much.

And here's a mention of the Hibari in an article by Thorsten Loesch (warning: lotsa pop-ups!):

http://www.fortunecity.com/rivendell...io/Adagio.html

Kondo uses sixteen BB 16 bit PCM56s per channel (in parallel) with a passive I/V section, and vacuum tube output stage. There are a couple of advantages to doing it this way. THD+N will be -3dB for every doubling of DAC chips (but no CMR for paralleling). And a far lower resistance value to ground that the DAC's current output sees (closer to the ideal zero ohm..).

Or he just may like the idea of a single DAC for each of the 16 bits.

BTW, I do believe that different DAC chips DO sound different. Even with proper implementation, I wouldn't want to listen to a MASH DAC.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2002, 05:20 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
Quote:
Originally posted by jwb
At $33/ea for one DAC chip, and hundreds of dollars in parts for a complete DAC, it is slightly painful to experiment with different parts or designs. What's really needed is a DIYAudio pow-wow where we can all huddle together and listen to our creations comparatively!
To compare DAC chips, the circuit doesn't have to be complicated at all. Even PCM 1704 can be implemented in non oversampling mode.

http://home.triad.rr.com/scottnixon/dac.htm
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2002, 07:17 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
steve jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver USA
I don't have the link handy, but a fellow on the Digital Asylum sold his Audio Note DAC 4.1X (non-oversampled AD1865) for a Zanden (non-oversampled PCM1704). Both have tube outputs.

This might not be a true (apples to apples) comparison, as the Zanden compensates for Sin(x)/Sin high frequency roll off with a peaking analog filter (the AN doesn't) , but the guy rates the Zanden highly.

I think he wrote the Zanden was a "10, with the AN a "7", and the 47 Lab Shingari a "3".

FWIW.

When I get back to work I might get a $175 Pioneer DV656 CD/DVD/DVD-A player (uses a BB DAC), and yank out the DAC, and use the SDATA, LRCLK, and WCLK (should be 24 bit Sony/BB/Japanese format) directly to 74VHC74 buffer and then to a standalone pair PCM1704s.

But until then.....so much time, so little money.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My DAC on AD1865 waldez Digital Line Level 1 21st April 2009 01:38 AM
AD1865 w/ USB? dsavitsk Digital Source 6 28th February 2006 10:47 AM
D1 i/v with AD1865 drobert Digital Source 0 28th July 2005 08:15 AM
AD1865 where? avian Digital Source 2 5th January 2004 07:17 AM
Wtb:- Ad1865 vt4c Swap Meet 1 26th March 2002 09:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2