Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd May 2005, 09:45 PM   #1
OliverD is offline OliverD  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
OliverD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Germany
Default Discrete "diamond" I/V stage

Hello all,

recently I've been experimenting a lot with the diamond buffer topology. It has some interesting properties which make it a good input stage for "current feedback" amplifiers. A well known implementation of this topology is Elektor's "titan" or "gigant" amplifier. The output of the diamond buffer is used as the feedback node.

I put "current feedback" in quotes to avoid lengthy discussions about the definition of the term "current feedback". For now, I'm referring to injecting the feedback signal (the output voltage) as a current into a low impedance node.

Coincidentally, injecting a current into a low impedance node is exactly what most current DACs like to do. So why not use a "cfb" amplifier as an i/v-stage?

This is what I came up with: A standard implementation of the diamond buffer circuit using two constant current sources, the input being tied to ground and thus providing a low impedance "zero volts" node at the output, an output stage driven from the buffer, and a "current feedback" resistor between the voltage output and the buffer output. This resistor sets the "gain" where Vout = Iin * R-IV. The input and cascode stages share a common heavily filtered voltage reference.

The circuit is very fast and has a low impedance output being able to drive about everything. With a careful layout, no phase compensation is needed. The power supply is critical - the original uses heavy RC-filtering, no-feedback pre-regulators, capacitance multipliers and individual bypassing for each stage. Reistor values can be calculated easily once the active devices are selected and optimal bias currents are found.

The circuit can be used in a parallel or in a balanced configuration. For the balanced configuration, both halves should share the same voltage references for further noise reduction.

The design is still in progress and at the moment no PCB layout is available. I'm looking forward to your comments!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf diamond-iv.pdf (64.6 KB, 545 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 06:13 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
Hi Oliver D,

I also share your opinion about diamond transistor followed with a buffer. This is why I decided to try http://users.verat.net/~pedjarogic/audio/index.html.

Pedja used AD844 for the same purpose, with an option of using on-the-chip buffer OR external buffer.

Design also uses famous (we’ll see…) CS8412 / TDA1541A combination I want to try. From what I heard after mods I’ve done on some Marantz gear that uses TDA1541A/S2 – the expectations are high!!!

If you check the web-site carefully you'll notice some other options for I to V using MAX IC's.

Idea is great, we'll see how it works...

Regards,
Nick
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 06:28 AM   #3
banana is offline banana  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
I guess the lower side of the output stage should be npn.

Have u consider the folded cascode config? Maybe something like the one in THS3001.

http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ths3001.pdf
Attached Images
File Type: gif ths3001 block diagram.gif (10.9 KB, 850 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 06:47 AM   #4
hjelm is offline hjelm  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
hjelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Västerås
Nice circuit.
I do agree with banana though. Your lower part of the output stage must have at least one transistor wrong type and upside down.

How much gain do you have in the output stage, if you remove the feedback?
__________________
Hjelm
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 07:25 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
It appears, after a quick look, that THS3001's pin 5 is not accessible like on AD844 to implement I to V resistor.


Extreme_Boky
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ad844.pdf (11.8 KB, 143 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 01:56 PM   #6
OliverD is offline OliverD  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
OliverD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Germany
You are right guys. Lower side of the last two stages must be PNP and emitter upwards, of course. It was late when I drew the schematics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 02:24 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Default Trying not to repeat myself, but.......

These circuits sound better without the feedback loop. It really doesn't buy much wrt input impedance. Good to see some of you guys are thinking, instead of copying the '5532 out of the app note.

Jocko
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 05:15 PM   #8
OliverD is offline OliverD  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
OliverD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Germany
Default Re: Trying not to repeat myself, but.......

Quote:
These circuits sound better without the feedback loop. It really doesn't buy much wrt input impedance.
I will give it a try both ways to see if I can confirm the "odd" sound of cfb.

Quote:
Good to see some of you guys are thinking, instead of copying the '5532 out of the app note.


Nice to hear that from someone who knows better
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2005, 08:08 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Hang a resistor off pin 5 of the AD844 (as in the spec sheet for the IC - or was it the other CFB ... not sure of the number , to implement an IV convertor.)
The output diamond buffer in the IC will buffer the output. IC op amp but no GFB. Distortion and offset are both very low, I tried it many years ago, maybe I'll finally get around to making it and using in my system, or maybe I'll do it discretely with eight current mirrors though four are really two buffers and two are to bias the input stage plus one jfet to set all the currents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2005, 01:47 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Only works with a '844. Or a '846 if you still have some in your junque boit.

Jocko
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"An Adjustment-Free Complementary Power Amplifier" by J.Diamond jez Solid State 28 22nd August 2010 11:33 PM
What makes an amplifier "bright", "warm", or "neutral"? JohnS Solid State 51 13th December 2009 06:42 PM
help in adjusting Vout in the power supply of the "Brute force in a line stage" by Er jarthel Tubes / Valves 9 30th May 2006 07:47 AM
Line stage preamp, based on SY's "Heretical Unity gain line stage" Danko Tubes / Valves 23 18th July 2005 04:07 AM
Effect of cross-coupled "local" FB on plate load of previous stage ray_moth Tubes / Valves 23 27th April 2005 08:55 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 AM.

Page generated in 0.10774 seconds (79.71% PHP - 20.29% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio