Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd April 2005, 10:12 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Default Is older better ?

Hi,

Sometime ago I got a Teac ZD700 CDP which uses one PCM53 for both channels. Seems to be 2 x os. Not very sophisticated design...

Sounds very good and I think it beats anything else I have.

Darker sound compared to other players but highs not missing. Darker means less mids and less lower highs. Not crying like modern DACs.
Very fine highs, strong bass, voices and instruments got body.

Absolutely clean spectrum without any adjustment. Both two tested chips. Never seen that before on any other DAC.

Datasheet states 16 bit monotonocity...

Will post pictures in DAC measurements thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 01:25 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Default Re: Is older better ?

Quote:
Originally posted by Bernhard
Sometime ago I got a Teac ZD700 CDP which uses one PCM53 for both channels. Seems to be 2 x os. Not very sophisticated design...
I have a very old Telefunken CDP with one PCM56 for both channels.

Quote:
Originally posted by Bernhard
Sounds very good and I think it beats anything else I have.
I wouldn't say so but mine sounds quite good too.
I changed all the 1uf leaking electrolythics (old Panasonics ), it was this player's only problem, it didn't read CDs at all, and somebody gave it to me for "recycling".
I've changed the op-amps for OPA2132 on the analog stage.
Proper PSU bypassing on the op-amps was done, of course.
It has 4 double op-amps, a high-order analog filter.
There are plenty of (good) styroflex caps around.
Oh, I also removed the muting transistors.
The sound is very "analog" indeed.
It has very good bass "slam" and dynamics, and the bass is surprisingly TIGHT, beats too many modern players in this respect.
It seems to be 2x OS, the digital filter is a Sony.
Transport is a plasticky, clanky Sony too.
It even has a digital output.
Red led display, no remote.
Very retro.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 07:10 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
This is PCM53.
Two generations before PCM56. Parallel data input.
When using one DAC for both channels there is a very little phase shift between left and right which could be noticeable.
But with one DAC for each channel, each channels signal passes a different sounding DAC.
Mono becomes pseudo stereo. Soundstage looses focus.

PCM56 is monotonic for 15 bits only.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 12:53 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by Bernhard
This is PCM53.
Two generations before PCM56. Parallel data input.
When using one DAC for both channels there is a very little phase shift between left and right which could be noticeable.
But with one DAC for each channel, each channels signal passes a different sounding DAC.
Mono becomes pseudo stereo. Soundstage looses focus.

PCM56 is monotonic for 15 bits only.

You mean the PCM53 is better than the PCM56?
Or is it just better in case of this implementation (single dac)?

Btw, I don't know exactly what year is my Telefunken made, but it looks certainly some years older than my Philips CD650.
I would say it's really a first generation CDP (1983~4)?
The PCM56 already existed but some brands still used the PCM53. Maby it was cheaper.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 06:12 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Your player probably got pots for distortion adjustment, little yellow ones close to the chips.

In this player there are three pots that adjust noise, never seen that before.
Noise floor of this player is a little worse up to 7 kHz, but this is from implementation I guess.

IMHO for me this chip got some benefits over PCM56 and others:

Spectrum is perfectly clean. Better than PCM63.

PCM56 and other chips distortion adjustment is not temperature stable, and it only gets perfect results on about 30% of chips.
PCM53 probably doesn`t need it. Just tested two chips.

Parallel data input allows inverting specific bits very easy.
Second chip per channel for adding inverted output ?

And it is industry standard compatible, there are industry instrumentation DACs that are pin compatible.

Always dreamed of a DAC that got ceramic DAC chips with gold plated pins

I post a picture later...
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 07:09 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
I know where to get an old Technics player (SL-P1) for 25 Euros.
It uses the PCM53.

Don't tempt me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 07:20 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
No idea how is this one.

Just bought one SL-P1 for 10 EUR and removed the chip without even testing if CDP works
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 07:31 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
25 Euros is negociable.
Is the Technics no good?
It has an impressively chunky transport, did you see it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 07:50 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Don`t remember the transport, just removed the main pcb on a flea market.
No idea if it is good.
You could buy it and if you do not like it, remove the pcb and send to me, I send you 2 x TDA1541A no crown in return.

Now negotiate
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2005, 08:54 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Italy
Hallo ,
Just resumed an old board of a Denon DCD (630?) from end '80 .
By your experience , have I a chance of putting to work a pair of PCM 56P and a digital filter NPC sm5818ap ( 8X ) soon after a CS8412 receiver ?
Or can the PCM 56P work also in non os mode...

In the board the Sony CXD1125 is supposed to be the receiver/processor .(...?)




  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Older PPI equipment bokaylaa Car Audio 11 15th April 2010 01:44 AM
Need help with older DEI amp whoya2350 Car Audio 21 6th April 2009 03:22 PM
help with older speaker madmallard Multi-Way 3 8th October 2008 09:32 PM
help with older drivers... mista2 Multi-Way 9 11th July 2005 12:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Page generated in 0.11371 seconds (81.96% PHP - 18.04% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio